Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T02:40:42.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Importance of Culturally Safe Assessment Tools for Inuit Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2017

Jasmin Stoffer
Jasmin Stoffer*
Affiliation:
School of Education PO Box 57, Wolfville, Nova Scotia B4P 2R6, Canada
*
address for correspondence: Jasmin Stoffer, School of Education PO Box 57, Wolfville, Nova Scotia B4P 2R6, Canada. Email: jstof057@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

There are still no major assessment and diagnostic tools that educators can use to properly assess our Inuit students’ learning. Cultural safety as it is currently defined in New Zealand educational research (Macfarlane et al., 2007) is necessary in creating a classroom community that encourages the appreciation of culture and worldview, and ultimately enables success as defined by the culture and community of the students. Modern day assessment tools used with Inuit students must also conform to this standard of cultural safety in order to ensure the equity and authenticity of the assessment results. There is a need for ongoing research and development of culturally safe assessment tools. To date, recommendations that include collaboration with local populations, evaluation of the tools presently being used, and the due diligence of ensuring these tools are culturally unbiased are a few guidelines that have the potential of creating culturally safe assessments that portray students’ true learning abilities and assist both teacher and community in the support of their students’ learning and success.

Keywords

educationinuitcultural safetyassessment
Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , August 2017 , pp. 64 - 70
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, J. (2007). Aboriginal young children's language and literacy development: Research evaluating progress, promising practices, and needs. Retrieved January 18, 2016, from http://www.afn.ca/uploads/files/education2/aboriginal_young_childrens_languag_&_literacy_development,_j._ball,_2007.pdf.Google Scholar
Brascoupé, S., & Waters, C. (2009). Cultural Safety: Exploring the applicability of the concept of cultural safety to aboriginal health and community wellness. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 5 (2), 6–41.Google Scholar
Government of Nunavut (2008) Foundation for Dynamic Assessment Ilitaunnikulirniq: As Learning in Nunavut Schools. Retrieved January 11, 2016, from http://www.gov.nu.ca/sites/default/files/files/IlitaunnikuliriniqDynamicAssessment.pdf.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, A., Glynn, T., Cavanagh, T., & Bateman, S. (2007). Creating culturally-safe schools for Maori students. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, C. (2006). Creating a joint partnership: Including qallunat teacher voices within Nunavik education policy. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 10 (4–5), 429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mushquash, C.J., & Bova, D. (2007). Cross-cultural assessment and measurement issues. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 13 (1), 53–66.Google Scholar
National Committee on Inuit Education (2011). First Canadians, Canadians First: National Strategy on Inuit Education, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami.Google Scholar
Pearson Clinical (2016). Qualifications policy, clinical psychology. Retrieved May 1, 2016 from http://www.pearsonclinical.com/psychology/qualifications.html.Google Scholar
Pearson Clinical (2016). The peabody picture vocabulary test (Fourth ed.) Retrieved March 4, 2016 from https://www.pearsonclinical.com.au/products/view/242#tabs=2.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (2015). The Final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future. Winnipeg, Manitoba.Google Scholar
Williams, R. (1999). Cultural safety – what does it mean for our practice? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 23 (2), 213–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed