Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T02:19:43.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indigenous Learning Preferences and Interactive Technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2016

Andrew Kitchenham*
Affiliation:
School of Education, University of Northern British Columbia, BC, Canada, V2N 4Z9
*
address for correspondence: Andrew Kitchenham, School of Education, University of Northern British Columbia, BC, Canada, V2N 4Z9. Email: andrew.kitchenham@unbc.ca.
Get access

Abstract

This three-year research study examined the influence of interactive technologies on the math achievement of Indigenous students in Years 4, 5, 6 and 7 technology — equipped classrooms in a rural elementary school in British Columbia, Canada. Using a mixed-methods approach, the researcher conducted semistructured interviews and collected math achievement data (reported elsewhere) over a three-year span, and distributed a survey to the teachers in the second year of the study. All data sources revealed that interactive technologies such as SMARTBoards, student response systems and document cameras influence positively Indigenous students’ math achievement over a three-year period.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberta Education, Aboriginal Services Branch. (2005). Our words, our ways: Teaching first nations, metis, and inuit learners. Edmonton, AB: Author.Google Scholar
Cooper, T.J., Warren, E., & Doig, S.M. (2004). Young “white” teachers’ perceptions of mathematics learning of aboriginal and non-aboriginal students in remote communities. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 2, (pp. 71246).Google Scholar
El Sayed, F., Soar, J., & Wang, Z. (2012). Key factors for the development of a culturally appropriate interactive multimedia informative program for Aboriginal health workers. The Australian Journal of Indigneous Education, 41, 162172. doi: 10.1017/jie.2012.19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
First Nations Education Steering Committee (FNESC). (2015). First Peoples’ principles of learning. Retrieved July 17, 2015 from http://www.fnesc.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/PUB-LFP-POSTER-Principles-of-Learning-First-Peoples-poster-11x17.pdf.Google Scholar
Green, N. (1982). The classroom teacher's influence on the performance of Aboriginal children. In Sherwood, J. (Ed.), Aboriginal education: Issues and innovations (pp. 107126). Perth, Australia: Creative Research.Google Scholar
Hughes, P., & More, A. (1997). Aboriginal ways of learning and learning styles. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. AARE: Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved from www.aare.edu.au/97pap/hughp518.htm.Google Scholar
Kitchenham, A.D. (2009). Mixed method research. In Mills, A., Durepos, G. & Wiebe, E. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 561563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kitchenham, A.D. (2013). The preservation of Indigenous language and culture through educational technology. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 19 (4), 351364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, M. (2012). Teacher education with indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing as a key pillar. AlterNative, 8 (3), 343356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
More, A. (1987). Native Indian learning styles: A review for researchers and teachers. Journal of American Indian Education, 27 (1), 1729.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, C., Baydala, L., & Sherman, J. (2004). Learning patterns and education of Aboriginal children: A review of the literature. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 24, 317342.Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swisher, K. (1994). American Indian learning styles survey: An assessment of teachers’ knowledge. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 13, 5977.Google Scholar
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (Eds.) (2003). Handbook of mixed-methods in social and behavioral sciences research (pp. 350). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Toulouse, P.R. (2008). Integrating aboriginal teaching and values into the classroom. What Works? Research into Practice, 11, 14.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Committee of Canada (TRCC). (2015a). Truth and reconciliation committee of Canada: Calls to action. Winnipeg, MB: Author.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Committee of Canada (TRCC). (2015b). Honouring the truth, reconciling the future: Summary of the final report of the truth and reconciliation committee of Canada. Winnipeg, MB: Author.Google Scholar
Vancouver IslandNet. (2008). Vancouver Island net diagnostic math assessment. Retrieved July 17, 2015 from http://web.sd71.bc.ca/islandnet/index.php?page=dma.Google Scholar
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, ON: Althouse Press.Google Scholar
van Manen, M. (1991). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. London, ON: Althouse Press.Google Scholar
van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
White, F. (2008). Ancestral language acquisition among Native Americans: A study of the Haida language class. New York, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
White, F. (2014). Emerging from out of the margins: Essays on Haida language, culture, and history. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar