Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:05:25.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indigenous Research: Three Researchers Reflect on their Experiences at the Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Deanne Minniecon ,
Naomi Franks  and
Maree Heffernan
Deanne Minniecon
Affiliation:
Woodridge, Queensland, 4114, Australia
Naomi Franks
Affiliation:
Oodgeroo Unit, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, 4059, Australia
Maree Heffernan
Affiliation:
Centre for Social Change Research, Queensland University of Technology, Beams Road, Carseldine, Queensland, 4034, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Utilising Nakata’s (2007) description of the “cultural interface”, two Indigenous researchers and one non-Indigenous researcher examine their development of Indigenous research in and with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities conducted from within an institution of higher education. The authors reflect on their experiences in developing an Indigenous research project and use Indigenous standpoint theory as a device to explore these experiences. The framing of priorities and research questions, ethics processes, the treatment of project information or data, the managing of competing accountabilities, and the role of non-Indigenous researchers in Indigenous research are all explored in these reflections.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 36 , Issue S1: (Re)Contesting Indigenous Knowledges & Indigenous Studies , 2007 , pp. 23 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Foley, D. (2003). Indigenous epistemology and Indigenous standpoint theory. Social Alternatives, 22(1), 44–52.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (2004). A socially relevant philosophy of science? Resources from standpoint theory’s controversiality. Hypatia, 19(1), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jandt, F., & Tanno, D. (2001). Decoding domination, encoding self-determination: Intercultural communication research processes. The Howard Journal of Communications, 12, 119–135.Google Scholar
Lampert, J. (2003). The alabaster academy: Being a non-Indigenous academic in Indigenous studies. Social Alternatives, 22(3), 23–26.Google Scholar
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2004). Whiteness, epistemology and Indigenous representation. In Moreton-Robinson, A. (Ed.), Whitening race: Essays in social and cultural criticism. (pp. 75–88). Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (2007). The culteral interface. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education. 36 S1, 6–13.Google Scholar
Queensland University of Technology. (2007). Manual of policies and procedures: Policy D/6.3 - Research involving the participation of humans. Retrieved 4 April, 2007, from http://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/D/D_06_03.jsp.Google Scholar
Rigney, L-R. (2001). A first perspective of Indigenous Australian participation in science: Framing Indigenous research towards Indigenous Australian intellectual sovereignty. Kauma Higher Education Journal, 7, 1–13.Google Scholar
Smith, L. (1999). Decolonising methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Weber-Pillwax, C. (2001). What is Indigenous research? Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25(2): 166–176.Google Scholar