Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:58:00.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching Beginning Teachers to ‘Think What We Are Doing’ in Indigenous Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2014

Barbara Kameniar ,
Sally Windsor  and
Sue Sifa
Barbara Kameniar*
Affiliation:
Murrup Barak, The Melbourne Institute for Indigenous Development, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, Victoria, Australia
Sally Windsor
Affiliation:
Murrup Barak, The Melbourne Institute for Indigenous Development, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, Victoria, Australia
Sue Sifa
Affiliation:
Murrup Barak, The Melbourne Institute for Indigenous Development, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, Victoria, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Barbara Kameniar, Indigenous Academic Enrichment Program, Murrup Barak, Melbourne Institute for Indigenous Development, Old Physics Building, The University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3010, Australia. Email: b.kameniar@unimelb.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

Working with beginning teachers to assist them to begin to ‘think what we do’ (Arendt, 1998) in both mainstream and Indigenous education is problematic. This is particularly so because the majority of our teacher candidates, and indeed most of their university lecturers, are positioned close to the racial, social and cultural centre of Australian education. That is, teachers and teacher educators tend to be white, middle class, educationally successful, and accepting of the main premises and assumptions, purposes and values of formal schooling in Australia. This proximity to the centre can lead to an inability to question ideas and practices that, while everyday and seemingly innocuous, are frequently dangerous and destructive for those at the margins. In this article, we illustrate the normative power of hegemonic ideas by using aspects of the teen fiction The Hunger Games as an analogy for ‘thoughtless’ and unquestioning acceptance of authority. We then describe and discuss a pedagogic practice used within the Master of Teaching program at the Melbourne Graduate School of Education. The practice is designed to challenge normative understandings about Australian history, teaching Indigenous Australian students, and to encourage engagement with the German-American Jewish philosopher and political theorist Hannah Arendt's provocative question ‘What are we doing?’ (Arendt, 1998, p. 5). We conclude the article with a challenge to re-think current policies and practices in the education of Indigenous Australians.

Keywords

Indigenous educationbeginner teachersThe Hunger GamesHannah Arendt
Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , December 2014 , pp. 113 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, H. (1971). Thinking and moral considerations: A lecture. Social Research, 38 (3), 417–446.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (2006). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Bates, T.R. (1975). Gramsci and the theory of hegemony. Journal of the History of Ideas, 36 (2), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, S., & Townsend-Cross, M. (2008). Indigenous pedagogy as a force for change. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 37 (Suppl.), 146–154.Google Scholar
Brodkin, K. (1999). Studying whiteness: What's the point and where do we go from here? In McKay, B. (Ed.), Unmasking whiteness Brisbane, Australia: Griffith University.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2011). Hannah Arendt's death sentences. Comparative Literature Studies, 48 (3), 280–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celermajer, D.(Writer) & ABC (Director). (2012). The inconsistency of Hannah Arendt [Radio], The Philosopher's Zone. ABC Radio.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Egan, T., & Ingpen, R. (1997). The drover's boy. Melbourne, Australia: Lothian.Google Scholar
Fogarty, W., & Schwab, R.G. (2012). Indigenous education: Experiential learning and learning through country. Working Paper No 81 CAEPR Working Papers. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR), Australian National University.Google Scholar
Frankenburg, R. (1993). White women race matters: The social construction of whiteness. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankl, V.E. (2011). Man's search for meaning, London: Random House.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. (2011). The component of best-practice Indigenous education: A comparative review. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 40, 69–80.Google Scholar
Hewitt, J., & Hall, P.M. (1973). Social problems, problematic situations and quasi-theories. American Sociological Review, 38, 367–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, P. (Producer). (1992). Keating speech: The Redfern address. Spoken Word. Retrieved from http://aso.gov.au/titles/spoken-word/keating-speech-redfern-address/extras/Google Scholar
Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V., & Miller, S. (Eds.). (2003). Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marchant, B., Egan, T., & Evans, N. (1995). The drover's boy: Series of paintings. Bundeena, Australia: Marchant.Google Scholar
McCollow, J. (2012). A controversial reform in Indigenous education: The Cape York Aboriginal Australian Academy. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 41, 97–109. doi:10.1017/jie.2012.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, S. (2013). Learning versus education: Rethinking learning in Anangu schools. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 42 (2), 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1985). Equilibration of cognitive structures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Razack, S. (2001). Looking white people in the eye: Gender, race and culture in courtrooms and classrooms. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Sarra, C. (2011, October). Keynote address: Time for a high expectations relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australia. Paper presented at the Strong Start Bright Futures Conference, Darwin, Australia.Google Scholar
Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
Yates, L. (1992). Postmodernism, feminism and cultural politics; or, if master narratives have been discredited what does Giroux think he is doing? Discourse, 13 (1), 124–133.Google Scholar