Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:17:15.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where Do We Look Now? The Future of Research in Indigenous Australian Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Neil Harrison
Neil Harrison*
Affiliation:
School of Education, Macquarie University, New South Wales, 2109, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Research in Indigenous Australian education is at a dead-end. Researchers are still heading out into the field to look for new knowledge to answer old questions. The same epistemology dominates how we look, and where, while the methodology provides the researcher with a forced choice, one where either the student or the teacher is blamed for the lack of outcomes in Indigenous education. Where do we look now, and can we find something that has not been found before? The unequal historical relation that persists across Australia suggests that the process of research itself could be given as much attention as the search for quantifiable outcomes. The paper proposes that this process focus on the production of relations between schools and communities as well as on the search for knowledge.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , 2007 , pp. 1 - 5
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beresford, Q. (2003). Directions and best practice. In Beresford, Q., & Partington, G. (Eds.), Reform and resistance in Aboriginal education: The Australian experience (pp. 238–278). Perth, WA: University of Western Australia Press.Google Scholar
Craven, R. (Ed.). (1999). Teaching Aboriginal studies. Sydney, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dodson, M. (2000). Human genetics: Control of research and sharing of benefits. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 1, pp. 56–71.Google Scholar
Felman, S. (1987). Jacques Lacan and the adventure of insight: Psychoanalysis in contemporary culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1979). My body, this paper, this fire. Oxford Literary Review, 4, 9–28.Google Scholar
Haraway, D.J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (Ed.). (1993). The “racial” economy of science: Toward a democratic future. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, N. (2003). Grounded theory or grounded data? The production of power and knowledge in ethnographic research. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 32, 101–106.Google Scholar
Harrison, N. (2004). Rethinking critical thinking: Indigenous students studying at university. Teaching Education, 15(4), 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, J. (2006). Strategies for teacher retention in remote communities. Paper presented to GARMA Festival, 2006, Arnhem Land, Northern Territory Retrieved 26 April, 2007, from http://www.cdu.edu.au/garma/program.html.Google Scholar
Langton, M. (1993). “Well, I heard it on the radio and I saw it on the television…”: An essay for the Australian Film Commission on the politics and aesthetics of filmmaking by and about Aboriginal people and things. North Sydney, NSW: Australian Film Commission.Google Scholar
Langton, M., & Palmer, L. (2004). Treaties, agreement making and the recognition of Indigenous customary politics. In Langton, M., Palmer, L., Tehan, M., & Shain, K. (Eds.), Honour among nations: Treaties and agreements with Indigenous people (pp. 34–49). Carlton, VIC: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Malin, M. (1997). Moving on to…what? Theorising Aboriginal education: A reply. Education Australia, 35, 6–9.Google Scholar
Mellor, S., & Corrigan, M. (2004). The case for change: A review of contemporary research on Indigenous education outcomes. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (2004). Ongoing conversations about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research agendas and directions. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 33, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New South Wales Department of Education and Training and New South Wales Aboriginal Education Consultative Group Incorporated. (2004). The Report of the Review of Aboriginal Education/ Yanigurra Muya: Ganggurrinyma Yaarri Guurulaw Yirringin.gurray Freeing the Spirit: Dreaming as Equal Future. Darlinghurst, NSW: New South Wales Department of Education and Training.Google Scholar
New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (2003). Quality teaching in NSW public schools. Retrieved 30 April, 2007, from http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/qualityteach/resources/phases/index.htm.Google Scholar
Rigney, L-I. (1999). Internationalization of an Indigenous anticolonial cultural critique of research methodologies: A guide to Indigenist research methodology and its principles. Wicazo Sa Review: Journal of Native American Studies, 14(2), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeegers, M., Muir, W., & Lin, Z. (2003). The primacy of the Mother tongue: Aboriginal literacy and non-Standard English. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 32, 51–60.Google Scholar