Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:19:44.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case Management in Occupational Rehabilitation: Would the Real Case Manager Please Stand Up?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2015

Dianna T. Kenny*
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney
*
Department of Behavioural Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

Key stakeholders (injured workers, rehabilitation co-ordinators, rehabilitation providers, treating doctors and insurers) in the occupational rehabilitation process were interviewed to gain their perspective concerning the degree to which case management was viewed as the organising principle of post-injury management and to whom this role was most frequently assigned. Findings indicated that there were differences in stakeholder perceptions about who should fill this role for the injured worker, with the majority of each group claiming case management as their proper role. In contrast, 35% of the injured workers interviewed stated that they either did not have a case manager or that they case managed themselves. Although it was argued that rehabilitation co-ordinators are suitably placed to act as case managers, they were nominated least by injured workers. Three vignettes of successful case management were presented and recommendations for policy and practice were made.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blum, A., & Mauch, R. (1990). R.N. case manager can help provide appropriate care, cost management. Occupational Health and Safety, 59(4), 6869.Google ScholarPubMed
Bockting, A., & Hulsman, T. (1990). The link between disability assessment and rehabilitation: The system in the Netherlands. In Berkowitz, M. (Ed.), Forging linkages: Modifying disability programs to encourage employment (pp 95120). New York: Rehabilitation International.Google Scholar
Dean, D. H. (1990). Vocational rehabilitation innovations for disabled persons within the Federal Republic of Germany. In Berkowitz, M. (Ed.). Forging linkages: Modifying disability benefit programs to encourage employment (pp 4366). New York: Rehabilitation International.Google Scholar
Greenwood, J.G., Wolf, H.J., Pearson, J.C., Woon, C.L., Posey, P., & Main, C.F. (1990). Early intervention in low back disability among coal miners in West Virginia: Negative findings. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 32, 10471052.Google ScholarPubMed
Jahoda, M. (1981). Work, employment and unemployment: Values, theories and approaches in social research. American Psychologist, 36, 184191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. T. (1994). Determinants of time lost from workplace injury: The impact of the injury, the injured, the industry, the intervention and the insurer. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 17, 333342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenny, D. T. (1995a). Barriers to Occupational Rehabilitation: An exploratory study of long term injured workers. Journal of Occupational Health and Safety – Australia and New Zealand, 11(3), 249256.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. T. (1995b) Common themes, different perspectives: A systemic analysis of employer-employee experiences of occupational rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 39, 5477.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. T. (1995c). Occupational rehabilitation in New South Wales. A report to the WorkCover Authority of New South Wales on the practice of occupational rehabilitation in the Newcastle, Hunter and Upper Hunter regions. (ISBN 0909353 51 4).Google Scholar
Morrison, M. H. (1993). Rehabilitation and return to work: Do other countries succeed? Work, 3, 4854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Brien, G. E., & Feather, N.T. (1990). The relative effects of unemployment and quality of employment on the affect, work values, and personal control of adolescents. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 151165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarvydas, V.M., & Cottone, R.R. (1991). Ethical responses to legislative, organisational and economic dynamics: A four level model of ethical practice. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 22(4), 1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, M., & Karls, J. M. (1985). Case management in human service practice. California: Jossey-Bass Ltd.Google Scholar
Williams, C., & Thorpe, B. (1992). Beyond industrial sociology. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Winefield, A.H., Tiggemann, M., Winefield, H.R., & Goldney, R.D. (1993). Growing up with unemployment: A longitudinal study of its psychological impact. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
WorkCover Authority of New South Wales. (1992, 1993, 1994). WorkCover Statistics. Sydney, New South Wales: Author.Google Scholar