Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:47:44.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Motivation, Psychological Distress and Exercise Adherence Following Myocardial Infarction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2015

Mary Angela Ljubic
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong, Australia.
Frank P. Deane*
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong, Australia. fdeane@uow.edu.au
Robert P. Zecchin
Affiliation:
Westmead Hospital, Australia.
Robert Denniss
Affiliation:
University of Sydney and Westmead Hospital, Australia.
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr Frank Deane, Illawarra Institute for Mental Health, University of Wollongong, Building 22, Wollongong NSW 2522, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

Fifty patients with myocardial infarction were recruited from a hospital based Cardiac Education and Assessment Program (CEAP) in Sydney, Australia. The Exercise Motivation Inventory-2 (EMI-2) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) were administered prior to commencement in the program and re-administered by telephone interview at 5-month followup. Four exercise adherence measures were completed: attendance, exercise stress test, self-report ratings and a 7-day activity recall interview. There was a 46% adherence rate for MI patients during the hospital based CEAP. Of those individuals who completed CEAP, 91% obtained functional improvement on the exercise stress test. For the 38 patients who were followed-up by telephone interview at 5 months, 71% were exercising according to CEAP prescription. Higher levels of anxiety were associated with lower levels of self-reported exercise adherence. The 3 strongest motivations for exercise in this group of MI patients were all health related; wanting to be free from illness, maintaining good health and recovering from the effects of coronary heart disease. The discussion highlights the implications of these findings for cardiac rehabilitation programs and the need for empirically driven guidelines for measuring exercise adherence.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)