Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:12:56.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nature of Social Support Available to People Living with Spinal Cord Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2017

Sian Reilly  and
Gregory Murphy
Sian Reilly*
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Australia
Gregory Murphy*
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Australia
*
School of Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
School of Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
Get access

Abstract

This study examined the nature of the social support received by persons following spinal cord injury (SCI). Social support was assessed through use of an abridged version of the ISEL scale (Cohen et al., 1985), a self-report measure of perceived support. Seventy persons who had been living in the community at least one year post discharge from hospital provided information about four types of support received — instrumental, emotional, informational, and appraisal social support. The aim of this study was to identify whether there were any significant differences in the perceived availability of the four types of social support. Analyses revealed that overall there were significant (p < .05) perceived differences in the average availability of the four separate types of support, with Instrumental support being seen as the most available. Taken together, these findings support the usefulness of measuring separately the different types of social support perceived to be available to individuals, and thus hold important implications for the rehabilitation effort following SCI.

Type
Articles
Information
The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 2002 , pp. 30 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrera, M., Sandler, I., & Ramsay, T. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 435–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (1992). Stress, social support and disorder. In Veiel, H. & Baumann, U. (Eds.), The meaning and measurement of social support. New York, USA: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., & Hoberman, H. (1983). Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 99–125.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., & McKay, G. (Eds.). (1984). Social support, stress and the buffering hypothesis: A theoretical analysis (Vol. 4). New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., & Hoberman, H. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In Sarason, I. & Sarason, B. (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 73–94). Dordect, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., & Syme, L. (Eds.). (1985). issues in the study and application of social support. Orlando, USA: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. (1985). Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.Google Scholar
Cutrona, C. (1990). Stress and social support: In search of optimal matching. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 3–14.Google Scholar
Elliott, T., Herrick, S., Witty, T., Godshall, F. & Spruell, M. (1992). Social relationships and psychosocial impairment of persons with spinal cord injury. Psychology and Health, 7, 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitzmann, C., & Kaplan, R. (1988). Assessment of methods for measuring social support. Health Psychology, 7, 75–109.Google Scholar
House, J. (1981). Work stress and social support. MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
House, J., & Kahn, R. (1985). Measures and Concepts of Social Support. In Cohen, S. & Syme, L. (Eds.), Social support and health. New York, USA: New York Academic.Google Scholar
Krause, J., & Crewe, N. (1991). Chronological age, time since injury, and time of measurement: Effect on adjustment after spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72, 91–100.Google Scholar
McColl, M., & Rosenthal, C. (1994). A model of resource needs of ageing spinal cord injured men. Paraplegia, 32, 261–270.Google Scholar
McColl, M., & Skinner, H. (1995). Assessing inter and intrapersonal resources: Social support and coping among adults with a disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 17, 24–34.Google Scholar
Minium, E., King, B., & Bear, G. (1993). Statistical reasoning in psychology and education (3rd ed.). New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Moos, R., & Moos, B. (1976). Family environment scale. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, G., & Young, A. (1998). Contradictory effects of social support in rehabilitation. Australian Journal of Primary Health — Interchange, 4, 8–16.Google Scholar
Norbeck, J. (1985). Types and sources of social support for managing job stress in critical care nursing. Nursing Research, 34, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, P., & Cripps, R. (1997). Spinal cord injury, Australia. 1995-1996. Australian Injury Prevention Bulletin, 16, 1–11.Google Scholar
Post, M., Ros, W., & Schrijvers, A. (1999). Impact of social support on health status and life satisfaction in people with a spinal cord injury. Psychology and Health, 14, 679–695.Google Scholar
Ros, W. (1990). Social support for cancer patients. Amsterdam: Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Schaefer, C., Coyne, J. & Lazarus, R. (1981). The health-related functions of social support. Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 4, 381–406.Google Scholar
Schultz, R., & Decker, S. (1985). Long term adjustment to physical disability: The role of social support, perceived control and self blame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1162–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeman, M. (1984). Social networks and coronary artery disease. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Tardy, C. (1985). Social support measurement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 187–202.Google Scholar
Vazquez Morejon, A., & Garcia-Boveda, R. (1997). The Manheim interview of social support psychometric characteristics of a Spanish version. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 32, 208–214.Google Scholar
Veiel, H., & Baumann, U. (1992). The Many Meanings of Social Support. In Veiel, H. & Baumann, U. (Eds.), The meaning and measurement of social support. New York, USA: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Winemiller, D., Mitchell, E., Sutliff, J., & Cline, D. (1993). Measurement strategies in social support: A descriptive review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 638–648.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed