Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:15:27.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychometric Validation of the Taiwanese Version of the Job Satisfaction of Persons with Disabilities Scale in a Sample of Individuals with Poliomyelitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2016

Susan Miller Smedema ,
Fong Chan ,
Ming-Hung Wang ,
Emre Umucu ,
Naoko Yura Yasui ,
Wei-Mo Tu ,
Nicole Ditchman  and
Chia-Chiang Wang
Susan Miller Smedema*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Fong Chan
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Ming-Hung Wang
Affiliation:
National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan
Emre Umucu
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Naoko Yura Yasui
Affiliation:
Alabama State University, Montgomery, Alabama, USA
Wei-Mo Tu
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Nicole Ditchman
Affiliation:
Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Chia-Chiang Wang
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Susan Miller Smedema, Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Special Education, University of Wisconsin – Madison, 1000 Bascom Mall, Room 419, Madison, WI 53706, USA, 608-265-0845. E-mail:ssmedema@wisc.edu
Get access

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the measurement structure of the Taiwanese Version of the Job Satisfaction of Persons with Disabilities Scale (JSPDS). Design: A quantitative descriptive research design using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Participants: One hundred and thirty-two gainfully employed individuals from Taiwan with poliomyelitis participated in this study. Results: EFA result indicated a three-factor structure accounting for 54.1 per cent of the total variance. The internal consistency reliability coefficients for the integrated work environment, job quality, and alienation factors were 0.91, 0.77, and 0.59, respectively. Only the integrated work environment and job quality factors showed positive correlations with life satisfaction. People with higher educational attainment also reported higher levels of job satisfaction than people with lower educational attainment. Conclusion: The three-factor measurement structure of the JSPDS appears to be parsimonious, psychologically meaningful, and interpretable, and can be used to improve the comprehensiveness of vocational rehabilitation outcome evaluation.

Keywords

Job satisfactionoutcome measurementvocational rehabilitationpoliomyelitis
Type
Articles
Information
The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , July 2016 , pp. 27 - 39
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Americans with Disabilities Act of (1990), Pub. L. No. 101–336, 104 Stat. 328.Google Scholar
Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of (2008), Pub. L. 110–325, § 42 Stat 12202. Retrieved from http://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08Google Scholar
Bond, G. R., Campbell, K., & Drake, R. E. (2012). Standardizing measures in four domains of employment outcomes for individual placement and support. Psychiatric Services, 63, 751–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.Google Scholar
Burke, R. (1999). Disability and women's work experiences: An exploratory study. International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy, 19, 21–33.Google Scholar
Chan, F. (2014). Job satisfaction for people with disabilities scale. Madison, WI: Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Evidence-Based Practice in Vocational Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Chan, F., Rubin, S. E., Lee, G., & Pruett, S. (2003). Empirically derived life skill factors for program evaluation in rehabilitation. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 34(4), 15–22.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlaum: Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.Google Scholar
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104.Google Scholar
Cottini, E., & Lucifora, C. (2013). Inequalities at work, job quality, health and low pay in European workplaces (GINI Discussion Paper 86). Retrieved from http://gini-research.org/system/uploads/586/original/86.pdf?1385131321.Google Scholar
Danish National Centre on Social Research (2008). Workers with disabilities express high job satisfaction. Retrieved from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/eurwork/articles/workers-with-disabilities-express-high-job-satisfaction.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.Google Scholar
Ditchman, N., Wu, M., Chan, F., Fitzgerald, S., Lin, C. P., & Tu, W. (2014). Vocational rehabilitation. In Strauser, D. (ed.). Career development, employment, and disability in rehabilitation: From theory to practice. (pp. 343–360). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Fritzsche, B. A., Dhanani, L. Y., & Spencer, J. M. (2014). Empowerment through employment: Job satisfaction theories and research. In Strauser, D. (ed.). Career development, employment, and disability in rehabilitation: From theory to practice. (pp. 139–159). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Great Britain (1995). Disability Discrimination Act 1995. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/50/pdfs/ukpga_19950050_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Great Britain (2010). Equality Act of 2010. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/pdfs/ukpga_20100015_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Griffin, D., Rosenberg, H., Cheyney, W., & Greenberg, B. (1996). A comparison of self-esteem and job satisfaction of adults with mild mental retardation in sheltered workshops and supported employment. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 142–151.Google Scholar
Hirst, M., Thornton, P., Dearey, M., & Campbell, S. (2004). The employment of disabled people in the public sector: A review of data and literature. Retrieved from http://www.drc.org.uk/publicationsandreports/campaigndetails.asp?section=restran&id=657.Google Scholar
Houser, R., & Chase, A. (1993). Job satisfaction of people with disabilities placed through a project with industry. Journal of Rehabilitation, 59(1), 45–48.Google Scholar
Hulin, C. L., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Job attitudes. In Borman, W. C., Ilgen, D. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (eds.). Handbook of psychology. (pp. 255–276). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Disability Rights Monitor (2004). Regional report of the Americas. Retrieved from http://bbi.syr.edu/publications/blanck_docs/2003-2004/IDRM_Americas_2004.pdf.Google Scholar
Jiranek, D., & Kirby, N. (1990). The job satisfaction and/or psychological well-being of young adults with an intellectual disability and non-disabled young adults in either sheltered employment, competitive employment or unemployment. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 16, 133–148.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A. & Watanabe, S. (1994). Individual differences in the nature of the relationship between job and life satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Watanabe, S. (1993). Another look at job satisfaction-life satisfaction relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 939–948.Google Scholar
Lam, C., Chan, F., & Thorpe, H. (1988). The effect of short-term practice on vocational assessment of mentally retarded workers. Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Bulletin, 21, 7–9.Google Scholar
Livneh, H., & Antonak, R. (1994). Indirect methods to measure attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Rehabilitation Education, 8, 103–137.Google Scholar
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In Dunnette, M. D. (ed.). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. (pp. 1297–1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
McAfee, J., & McNaughton, D. (1997a). Transitional outcomes: Job satisfaction of workers with disabilities – Part one: General job satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 8, 135–142.Google Scholar
McAfee, J., & McNaughton, D. (1997b). Transitional outcomes: Job satisfaction of workers with disabilities – Part two: Satisfaction with promotions, pay, co-workers, supervision, and work conditions. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 8, 243–251.Google Scholar
Ministry of Labor (2009). Employment rate in Taiwan. Taipei City: Ministry of Labor. Retrieved from http://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/year/year99/32040.htm.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pagan, R., & Malo, M. A. (2009). Job satisfaction and disability: Lower expectations about jobs or a matter of health?. Spanish Economic Review, 11, 51–74.Google Scholar
Petrovski, P., & Gleeson, G. (1997). The relationship between job satisfaction and psychological health in people with an intellectual disability in competitive employment. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 22(3), 1999–2211.Google Scholar
Rehabilitation Services Administration (2008). RSA Annual Review Report. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/rsa/2008/index.html.Google Scholar
Rubin, S. E., Chan, F., & Thomas, K. R. (2003). Assessing changes in life skills and quality of life resulting from rehabilitation services. Journal of Rehabilitation, 69(3), 4–9.Google Scholar
Schur, L., Kruse, D., Blasi, J., & Blanck, P. (2009). Is disability disabling in all workplaces?: Disability, workplace disparities and corporate culture. Industrial Relations, 48, 381–410.Google Scholar
Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tsaousides, T., Warshowsky, A., Ashman, T. A., Cantor, J. B., Spielman, L., & Gordon, W. A. (2009). The relationship between employment-related self-efficacy and quality of life following traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54(3), 299–305.Google Scholar
United Nations. (2007, November). Employment of Persons with Disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=255.Google Scholar
United States Office of Disability Employment Policy, U.S. Department of Labor. (n.d.). About ODEP. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/odep/about/.Google Scholar
Uppal, S. (2005). Disability, workplace characteristics and job satisfaction. International Journal of Manpower, 26(4), 336–349.Google Scholar
Waddell, G., & Burton, K. (2006). Is work good for your health and well-being. London: The Stationery Office. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/214326/hwwb-is-work-good-for-you.pdf.Google Scholar
Xie, H., Dain, B. J., Becker, D. R., & Drake, R. E. (1997). Job tenure among persons with severe mental illness. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 40, 230–239.Google Scholar
Yin, M., Shaewitz, D., & Megra, M. (2014). An uneven playing field: The lack of equal pay for people with disabilities. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from http://www.air.org/sites/default/files/Lack%20of%20Equal%20Pay%20for%20People%20with%20Disabilities_Dec%2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Zeilig, G., Weingarden, H., Shemesh, Y., Herman, A., Heim, M., Zeweker, M.et al., (2012). Functional and environmental factors affecting work status in individuals with longstanding poliomyelitis. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 35(1), 22–27.Google Scholar