Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:24:36.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

George Barany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Far from being afield of the theme assigned to me by the editor and board of the AHY, Professor Susan Gal's erudite essay admirably complements my own efforts. By approaching the topic from the point of view of historical anthropology, she adds another dimension to the discussion of a difficult problem. Indeed, I learned a lot from her, and not only about fractals, segmentary lineage systems, nested oppositions, and recursivity, intricacies that she articulates much better than I could hope in the context of traditional historiography.

Type
Forum
Information
Austrian History Yearbook , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 1998 , pp. 261 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Allan, Janik, “Vienna 1900 Revisited: Paradigms and Problems,” Austrian History Yearbook 28 (1997): 12 (quote), 23–27.Google Scholar

2 Walter, Kaufmann, trans., Goethe's Faust (New York, 1961), pt. 1, 2038–39.Google Scholar The original German reads: “Grau, teurer Freund, ist alle Theorie / Und grün des Lebens goldner Baum.” For a comprehensive critique of recent linguistic approaches to political cultures in the field of history, see Smith, Jay M., “No More Language Games: Words, Beliefs, and the Political Culture of Early Modern France,” American Historical Review 102 (1997): 1413–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Day, J. F. R., “Death Be Very Proud: Sidney, Subversion, and Elizabethan Heraldic Funerals,” in Tudor Political Culture, ed. Dale, Hoak (Cambridge, 1995), 182, 189 and n. 32, 202–3 and n. 72.Google Scholar

4 Hoak, ed., Tudor Political Culture, 2, introduction.Google Scholar

5 Etienne, Tassin, “Qu'est-ce qu'un sujet politique?”, Esprit, Mar.-Apr. 1997, 132–50. Cf. Michael, Walzer, “Communauté, citoyenneté et jouissance des droits,” Esprit, Mar.-Apr. 1997, 122–31.Google ScholarSee also Michael, Wintle, ed., Culture and Identity in Europe (Avebury, 1996).Google Scholar

6 Gal, , “Bartók's Funeral,” 446 n. 10.Google Scholar

7 József, Antall, Model és valóság (Model and reality), 2 vols. (Budapest, n.d.), 2:244. For Antall's evaluation of Horthy's historical role,Google Scholar see ibid., 2:574–90. Cf. Thomas, Sakmyster, Hungary's Admiral on Horseback, East European Monographs, no. 396 (Boulder, Colo., 1994).Google Scholar