No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Bridging the gap between intuitive and formal number concepts: An epidemiological perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 December 2008
Abstract
The failure of current bootstrapping accounts to explain the emergence of the concept of natural numbers does not entail that no link exists between intuitive and formal number concepts. The epidemiology of representations allows us to explain similarities between intuitive and formal number concepts without requiring that the latter are directly constructed from the former.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008
References
Castelli, F., Glaser, D. & Butterworth, B. (2006) Discrete and analogue quantity processing in the parietal lobe: A functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:4693–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Cruz, H. (2006) Why are some numerical concepts more successful than others? An evolutionary perspective on the history of number concepts. Evolution and Human Behavior 27:306–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, M. H. (2003) Cognitive representation of negative numbers. Psychological Science 14:278–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipton, J. S. & Spelke, E. S. (2006) Preschool children master the logic of number word meanings. Cognition 98:B57–B66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nichols, S. (2002) On the genealogy of norms: a case for the role of emotion in cultural evolution. Philosophy of Science 69:234–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlassis, J. (2004) Making sense of the minus sign or becoming flexible in “negativity”. Learning and Instruction 14:469–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar