Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T10:22:28.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can we really leave gender out of it? Individual differences and the Simulation of Smiles model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2010

Elizabeth Simpson  and
Dorothy Fragaszy
Elizabeth Simpson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-3013. simpsone@uga.edudoree@uga.eduhttp://simpsone.myweb.uga.edu/http://psychology.uga.edu/people/bios/faculty/Dorothy_M_Fragaszy.php
Dorothy Fragaszy
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-3013. simpsone@uga.edudoree@uga.eduhttp://simpsone.myweb.uga.edu/http://psychology.uga.edu/people/bios/faculty/Dorothy_M_Fragaszy.php
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gender differences in face-based emotion recognition, notably differential use of mimicry, may compromise the extent to which the Simulation of Smiles (SIMS) model can be generalized to populations besides the adult females on which it has been tested. Much work indicates sex differences in face-based emotion recognition, including smile recognition.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , December 2010 , pp. 459 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, D. V., Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Blackwell, K. C. & Smith, D. M. (2007) The confounded nature of angry men and happy women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92:179–90.Google Scholar
Biele, C. & Grabowska, A. (2006) Sex differences in perception of emotion intensity in dynamic and static facial expressions. Experimental Brain Research 171:1–6.Google Scholar
Cahill, L. (2006) Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7:477–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon, P. R., Hayes, A. E. & Tipper, S. P. (2009) An electromyographic investigation of the impact of task relevance on facial mimicry. Cognition and Emotion 23:918–29.Google Scholar
Cheng, Y., Chou, K.-H., Decety, J., Chen, I.-Y., Hung, D., Tzeng, O. J.-L. & Lin, C.-P. (2009) Sex differences in the neuroanatomy of human mirror-neuron system: A voxel-based morphometric investigation. Neuroscience 158:713–20.Google Scholar
Effron, D. A., Niedenthal, P. M., Gil, S. & Droit-Volet, S. (2006) Embodied temporal perception of emotion. Emotion 6:1–9.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. & Sripada, C. S. (2005) Simulationist models of face-based emotion recognition. Cognition 94(3):193–213.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K., Hutton, S. B. & Morgan, M. J. (2010) Sex differences in scanning faces: Does attention to the eyes explain female superiority in facial expression recognition? Cognition and Emotion |v24:629–37. [doi:10.1080/02699930902906882].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermans, E. J., Putman, P. & van Honk, J. (2006) Testosterone administration reduces empathetic behavior: A facial mimicry study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 31:859–66.Google Scholar
Krumhuber, E., Manstead, A. S. R. & Kappas, A. (2007) Temporal aspects of facial displays in person and expression perception: The effects of smile dynamics, head-tilt, and gender. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 31:39–56.Google Scholar
Lakin, J. L., Chartrand, T. L. & Arkin, R. M. (2008) I am too just like you: Nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychological Science 19:816–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niedenthal, P. M., Brauer, M., Halberstadt, J. & Innes-Ker, A. (2001) When did her smile drop? Facial mimicry and the influence of emotional state on the detection of change in emotional expression. Cognition and Emotion 15:853–64.Google Scholar
Oberman, L. M., Winkielman, P. & Ramachandran, V. S. (2007) Face to face: Blocking facial mimicry can selectively impair recognition of emotional expressions. Social Neuroscience 2:167–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saether, L., Van Belle, W., Laeng, B., Brennen, T. & Øvervoll, M. (2009) Anchoring gaze when categorizing faces' sex: Evidence from eye-tracking data. Vision Research 49:2870–80. [doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.001].Google Scholar
Schulte-Rüther, M., Markowtsch, H. J., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R. & Piefke, M. (2008) Gender differences in brain networks supporting empathy. NeuroImage 42:393–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schyns, P. G., Bonnar, L. & Gosselin, F. (2002) Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science 13:402–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, T. (2006) The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of the literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 30:855–63.Google Scholar
Stel, M. & van Knippenberg, A. (2008) The role of facial mimicry in the recognition of affect. Psychological Science 19:984–85.Google Scholar
Vigil, J. M. (2009) A socio-relational framework of sex differences in the expression of emotion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32:375–428.Google Scholar