Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:47:37.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2015

Chaz Firestone  and
Brian J. Scholl
Chaz Firestone
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8205chaz.firestone@yale.edu
Brian J. Scholl
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8205brian.scholl@yale.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What determines what we see? In contrast to the traditional “modular” understanding of perception, according to which visual processing is encapsulated from higher-level cognition, a tidal wave of recent research alleges that states such as beliefs, desires, emotions, motivations, intentions, and linguistic representations exert direct, top-down influences on what we see. There is a growing consensus that such effects are ubiquitous, and that the distinction between perception and cognition may itself be unsustainable. We argue otherwise: None of these hundreds of studies – either individually or collectively – provides compelling evidence for true top-down effects on perception, or “cognitive penetrability.” In particular, and despite their variety, we suggest that these studies all fall prey to only a handful of pitfalls. And whereas abstract theoretical challenges have failed to resolve this debate in the past, our presentation of these pitfalls is empirically anchored: In each case, we show not only how certain studies could be susceptible to the pitfall (in principle), but also how several alleged top-down effects actually are explained by the pitfall (in practice). Moreover, these pitfalls are perfectly general, with each applying to dozens of other top-down effects. We conclude by extracting the lessons provided by these pitfalls into a checklist that future work could use to convincingly demonstrate top-down effects on visual perception. The discovery of substantive top-down effects of cognition on perception would revolutionize our understanding of how the mind is organized; but without addressing these pitfalls, no such empirical report will license such exciting conclusions.

Type
Target Article
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e229
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, R. A. & Weidler, B. J. (2015) How far away is that? It depends on you: Perception accounts for the abilities of others. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 41:904–908.Google Scholar
Adelson, E. H. (2000) Lightness perception and lightness illusions. In: The new cognitive neurosciences, second edition, ed. Gazzaniga, M., pp. 339–51. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Alter, A. L. & Balcetis, E. (2011) Fondness makes the distance grow shorter: Desired locations seem closer because they seem more vivid. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47:16–21.Google Scholar
Anstis, S. (2002) Was El Greco astigmatic? Leonardo 35:208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anton-Erxleben, K., Henrich, C. & Treue, S. (2007) Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns. Journal of Vision 7(5):1–9.Google Scholar
Balcetis, E. (2016) Approach and avoidance as organizing structures for motivated distance perception. Emotion Review 8:115–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balcetis, E. & Dunning, D. (2006) See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91:612–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balcetis, E. & Dunning, D. (2010) Wishful seeing: More desired objects are seen as closer. Psychological Science 21:147–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balcetis, E., Dunning, D. & Granot, Y. (2012) Subjective value determines initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48:122–29.Google Scholar
Banerjee, P., Chatterjee, P. & Sinha, J. (2012) Is it light or dark? Recalling moral behavior changes perception of brightness. Psychological Science 23:407–409.Google Scholar
Bannert, M. M. & Bartels, A. (2013) Decoding the yellow of a gray banana. Current Biology 23(22):2268–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhalla, M. & Proffitt, D. R. (1999) Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25:1076–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Blake, R. & Sekuler, R. (2005) Perception, fifth edition. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bouvier, S. & Treisman, A. (2010) Visual feature binding requires reentry. Psychological Science 21:200–204.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1957) On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review 64:123–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, J. S. & Goodman, C. C. (1947) Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 42:33–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, J. S., Postman, L. & Rodrigues, J. (1951) Expectation and the perception of color. The American Journal of Psychology 64(2):216–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bubl, E., Kern, E., Ebert, D., Bach, M. & Tebartz van Elst, L. (2010) Seeing gray when feeling blue? Depression can be measured in the eye of the diseased. Biological Psychiatry 68:205–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cañal-Bruland, R., Pijpers, J. R. R. & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2010) The influence of anxiety on action-specific perception. Anxiety, Stress and Coping 23:353–61.Google Scholar
Cañal-Bruland, R., Zhu, F. F., van der Kamp, J. & Masters, R. S. W. (2011) Target-directed visual attention is a prerequisite for action-specific perception. Acta Psychologica 136:285–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrasco, M., Ling, S. & Read, S. (2004) Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience 7:308–13.Google Scholar
Carter, L. F. & Schooler, K. (1949) Value, need, and other factors in perception. Psychological Review 56:200–207.Google Scholar
Caruso, E. M., Mead, N. L. & Balcetis, E. (2009) Political partisanship influences perception of biracial candidates' skin tone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106:20168–73.Google Scholar
Cave, K. R. & Bichot, N. P. (1999) Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6:204–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Changizi, M. A. & Hall, W. G. (2001) Thirst modulates a perception. Perception 30:1489–97.Google Scholar
Chen, H. & Scholl, B. J. (2013) Congruence with items held in visual working memory boosts invisible stimuli into awareness: Evidence from motion-induced blindness [Abstract]. Journal of Vision 13(9):808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (1988) Perceptual plasticity and theoretical neutrality: A reply to Jerry Fodor. Philosophy of Science 55:167–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. S., Ramachandran, V. S. & Sejnowski, T. J. (1994) A critique of pure vision. In: Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain, ed. Koch, C. & Davis, J., pp. 23–60. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2013) Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(3):181–204.Google Scholar
Clerkin, E. M., Cody, M. W., Stefanucci, J. K., Proffitt, D. R. & Teachman, B. A. (2009) Imagery and fear influence height perception. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 23:381–86.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. A., Alvarez, G. A. & Nakayama, K. (2011) Natural-scene perception requires attention. Psychological Science 22:1165–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, S., Balcetis, E. & Dunning, D. (2012) Affective signals of threat increase perceived proximity. Psychological Science 24:34–40.Google Scholar
Cole, S., Balcetis, E. & Zhang, S. (2013) Visual perception and regulatory conflict: Motivation and physiology influence distance perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142:18–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, A. M. & Loftus, E. F. (1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 82:407–28.Google Scholar
Collins, J. A. & Olson, I. R. (2014) Knowledge is power: How conceptual knowledge transforms visual cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 21:843–60.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. D., Sterling, C. P., Bacon, M. P. & Bridgeman, B. (2012) Does action affect perception or memory? Vision Research 62:235–40.Google Scholar
Coren, S. & Enns, J. T. (1993) Size contrast as a function of conceptual similarity between test and inducers. Perception and Psychophysics 54:579–88.Google Scholar
Correll, J., Wittenbrink, B., Crawford, M. T. & Sadler, M. S. (2015) Stereotypic vision: How stereotypes disambiguate visual stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 108:219–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
den Daas, C., Häfner, M. & de Wit, J. (2013) Sizing opportunity: Biases in estimates of goal-relevant objects depend on goal congruence. Social Psychological and Personality Science 4:362–68.Google Scholar
Dils, A. T. & Boroditsky, L. (2010a) Processing unrelated language can change what you see. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 17:882–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dils, A. T. & Boroditsky, L. (2010b) Visual motion aftereffect from understanding motion language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107:16396–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doerrfeld, A., Sebanz, N. & Shiffrar, M. (2012) Expecting to lift a box together makes the load look lighter. Psychological Research 76:467–75.Google Scholar
Dunning, D. & Balcetis, E. (2013) Wishful seeing: How preferences shape visual perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22:33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durgin, F. H., Baird, J. A., Greenburg, M., Russell, R., Shaughnessy, K. & Waymouth, S. (2009) Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 16:964–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durgin, F. H., DeWald, D., Lechich, S., Li, Z. & Ontiveros, Z. (2011a) Action and motivation: Measuring perception or strategies? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 18(6):1077–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durgin, F. H., Klein, B., Spiegel, A., Strawser, C. J. & Williams, M. (2012) The social psychology of perception experiments: Hills, backpacks, glucose, and the problem of generalizability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38:1582–95.Google Scholar
Erdelyi, M. (1974) A new look at the new look: Perceptual defense and vigilance. Psychological Review 81:1–25.Google Scholar
Firestone, C. (2013a) How “paternalistic” is spatial perception? Why wearing a heavy backpack doesn't – and couldn't – make hills look steeper. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8:455–73.Google Scholar
Firestone, C. (2013b) On the origin and status of the “El Greco fallacy.” Perception 42:672–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firestone, C. & Scholl, B. J. (2014b) “Top-down” effects where none should be found: The El Greco fallacy in perception research. Psychological Science 25:38–46.Google Scholar
Firestone, C. & Scholl, B. J. (2015a) Can you experience top-down effects on perception? The case of race categories and perceived lightness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 22:694–700.Google Scholar
Firestone, C. & Scholl, B. J. (2015b) Enhanced visual awareness for morality and pajamas? Perception vs. memory in ‘top-down’ effects. Cognition 136:409–16.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983) Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1984) Observation reconsidered. Philosophy of Science 51:23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1988) A reply to Churchland's “Perceptual plasticity and theoretical neutrality.” Philosophy of Science 55:188–98.Google Scholar
Gantman, A. P. & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014) The moral pop-out effect: Enhanced perceptual awareness of morally relevant stimuli. Cognition 132:22–29.Google Scholar
Gao, T., McCarthy, G. & Scholl, B. J. (2010) The wolfpack effect: Perception of animacy irresistibly influences interactive behavior. Psychological Science 21:1845–53.Google Scholar
Geuss, M. N., Stefanucci, J. K., de Benedictis-Kessner, J. & Stevens, N. R. (2010) A balancing act: Physical balance, through arousal, influences size perception. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics 72:1890–902.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to perception and action. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gilbert, C. D. & Li, W. (2013) Top-down influences on visual processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14(5):350–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilchrist, A. & Jacobsen, A. (1984) Perception of lightness and illumination in a world of one reflectance. Perception 13:5–19.Google Scholar
Gobell, J. & Carrasco, M. (2005) Attention alters the appearance of spatial frequency and gap size. Psychological Science 16:644–51.Google Scholar
Goldstone, R. L. (1995) Effects of categorization on color perception. Psychological Science 6:298–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, R. L. & Barsalou, L. W. (1998) Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition 65:231–62.Google Scholar
Goldstone, R. L., de Leeuw, J. R. & Landy, D. H. (2015) Fitting perception in and to cognition. Cognition 135:24–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, R. (2013) Being selective at the plate: Processing dependence between perceptual variables relates to hitting goals and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39:1124–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Gray, R. & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2015) Attentional focus, perceived target size, and movement kinematics under performance pressure. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 22:1692–1700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, R., Navia, J. A. & Allsop, J. (2014) Action-specific effects in aviation: What determines judged runway size? Perception 43:145–54.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L. (1980) Perceptions as hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 290(1038):181–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Hansen, T., Giesel, M. & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2008) Chromatic discrimination of natural objects. Journal of Vision 8(2):1–19.Google Scholar
Hansen, T., Olkkonen, M., Walter, S. & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2006) Memory modulates color appearance. Nature Neuroscience 9(11):1367–68. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1038/nn1794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harber, K. D., Yeung, D. & Iacovelli, A. (2011) Psychosocial resources, threat, and the perception of distance and height: Support for the resources and perception model. Emotion 11:1080–90.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. (1866/1925) Handbuch der physiologischen optik. Leipzig: L. Voss. Translated as Treatise on physiological optics, vol. 3 (J. Southall, trans.). Optical Society of America. (Original work published in 1925).Google Scholar
Howard, I. P. & Rogers, B. J. (2002) Seeing in depth, vol. 2: Depth perception. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kanizsa, G. (1985) Seeing and thinking. Acta Psychologica 59:23–33.Google Scholar
Kirsch, W. (2015) Impact of action planning on spatial perception: Attention matters. Acta Psychologica 156:22–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirsch, W. & Kunde, W. (2013a) Moving further moves things further away in visual perception: Position-based movement planning affects distance judgments. Experimental Brain Research 226:431–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirsch, W. & Kunde, W. (2013b) Visual near space is scaled to parameters of current action plans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39:1313–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Klein, G. S., Schlesinger, H. J. & Meister, D. E. (1951) The effect of personal values on perception: An experimental critique. Psychological Review 58:96–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klemfuss, N., Prinzmetal, W. & Ivry, R. B. (2012) How does language change perception: A cautionary note. Frontiers in Psychology 3:Article 78. Available at: http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosslyn, S. M. (2005) Mental images and the brain. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22:333–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krauskopf, J. & Gegenfurtner, K. (1992) Color discrimination and adaptation. Vision Research 32:2165–75.Google Scholar
Krpan, D. & Schnall, S. (2014) Too close for comfort: Stimulus valence moderates the influence of motivational orientation on distance perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107:978–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landau, A. N., Aziz-Zadeh, L. & Ivry, R. B. (2010) The influence of language on perception: Listening to sentences about faces affects the perception of faces. The Journal of Neuroscience 30(45):15254–61. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2046-10.2010.Google Scholar
Landis, D., Jones, J. M. & Reiter, J. (1966) Two experiments on perceived size of coins. Perceptual and Motor Skills 23:719–29.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S., Yousem, H. & Arenberg, D. (1953) Hunger and perception. Journal of Personality 21:312–28.Google Scholar
Le Bihan, D., Turner, R., Zeffiro, T. A., Cuénod, C. A., Jezzard, P. & Bonnerot, V. (1993) Activation of human primary visual cortex during visual recall: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 90:11802–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, D. H., Mirza, R., Flanagan, J. G. & Anderson, A. K. (2014) Optical origins of opposing facial expression actions. Psychological Science 25(3):745–52. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613514451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Léger, L. & Chauvet, E. (2015) When canary primes yellow: Effects of semantic memory on overt attention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 22:200–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lessard, D. A., Linkenauger, S. A. & Proffitt, D. R. (2009) Look before you leap: Jumping ability affects distance perception. Perception 38:1863–66.Google Scholar
Levin, D. T. & Banaji, M. R. (2006) Distortions in the perceived lightness of faces: The role of race categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135:501–12.Google Scholar
Levin, D. T., Takarae, Y., Miner, A. G. & Keil, F. (2001) Efficient visual search by category: Specifying the features that mark the difference between artifacts and animals in preattentive vision. Perception and Psychophysics 63:676–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J.-L. & Yeh, S.-L. (2003) Do “Chinese and American see opposite apparent motions in a Chinese character”? Tse and Cavanagh (2000) replicated and revised. Visual Cognition 10:537–47.Google Scholar
Lo Sciuto, L. A. & Hartley, E. L. (1963) Religious affiliation and open-mindedness in binocular resolution. Perceptual and Motor Skills 17:427–30.Google Scholar
Long, G. M. & Toppino, T. C. (2004) Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: Alternating views of reversible figures. Psychological Bulletin 130:748–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupyan, G. (2012) Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: The label-feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology 3:Article 54.Google Scholar
Lupyan, G. & Spivey, M. J. (2008) Perceptual processing is facilitated by ascribing meaning to novel stimuli. Current Biology 18:R410–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupyan, G., Thompson-Schill, S. L. & Swingley, D. (2010) Conceptual penetration of visual processing. Psychological Science 21(5):682–91.Google Scholar
Lupyan, G. & Ward, E. J. (2013) Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110(35):14196–201. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1303312110.Google Scholar
Machery, E. (2015) Cognitive penetrability: A no-progress report. In: The cognitive penetrability of perception: New philosophical perspectives, ed. Zeimbekis, J. & Raftopoulos, A.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, F. (2012) Cognitive penetration of colour experience: Rethinking the issue in light of an indirect mechanism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84(1):24–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Robertson, T. E., Hofer, B., Neuberg, S. L., Delton, A.W., Butner, J. & Schaller, M. (2005) Functional projection: How fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88:63–78.Google Scholar
Masson, M. E. & Borowsky, R. (1998) More than meets the eye: Context effects in word identification. Memory and Cognition 26:1245–69.Google Scholar
Masters, R., Poolton, J. & van der Kamp, J. (2010) Regard and perceptions of size in soccer: Better is bigger. Perception 39:1290–95.Google Scholar
McCurdy, H. G. (1956) Coin perception studies and the concept of schemata. Psychological Review 63:160–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., Crawford, L. E. & Ahlvers, W. J. (2007) When “light” and “dark” thoughts become light and dark responses: Affect biases brightness judgments. Emotion 7(2):366–76. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.366.Google Scholar
Meteyard, L., Bahrami, B. & Vigliocco, G. (2007) Motion detection and motion verbs language affects low-level visual perception. Psychological Science 18:1007–13.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. E. & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971) Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90:227–34.Google Scholar
Mitterer, H., Horschig, J. M., Müsseler, J. & Majid, A. (2009) The influence of memory on perception: It's not what things look like, it's what you call them. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35:1557–62.Google Scholar
Most, S. B., Scholl, B. J., Clifford, E. R. & Simons, D. J. (2005b) What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review 112:217–42.Google Scholar
Nanay, B. (2014) Cognitive penetration and the gallery of indiscernibles. Frontiers in Psychology 5:1527.Google Scholar
New, J. J. & German, T. C. (2015) Spiders at the cocktail party: An ancestral threat that surmounts inattentional blindness. Evolution and Human Behavior 36:165–73.Google Scholar
Norris, D. (1995) Signal detection theory and modularity: On being sensitive to the power of bias models of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21:935–39.Google Scholar
Olkkonen, M., Hansen, T. & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2008) Color appearance of familiar objects: Effects of object shape, texture, and illumination changes. Journal of Vision 8(5):1–16.Google Scholar
Pan, Y., Lin, B., Zhao, Y. & Soto, D. (2014) Working memory biasing of visual perception without awareness. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics 76:2051–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pascucci, D. & Turatto, M. (2013) Immediate effect of internal reward on visual adaptation. Psychological Science 24:1317–22.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. A. & Gibson, B. S. (1991) Directing spatial attention within an object: Altering the functional equivalence of shape descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17:170–82.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. A. & Gibson, B. S. (1993) Shape recognition inputs to figure-ground organization in three-dimensional displays. Cognitive Psychology 25:383–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M. A. & Gibson, B. S. (1994) Object recognition contributions to figure-ground organization: Operations on outlines and subjective contours. Perception and Psychophysics 56:551–64.Google Scholar
Pitts, S., Wilson, J. P. & Hugenberg, K. (2014) When one is ostracized, others loom: Social rejection makes other people appear closer. Social Psychological and Personality Science 5:550–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz, J. & Seidel, A. (2012) Alligator or squirrel: Musically induced fear reveals threat in ambiguous figures. Perception 41:1535–39.Google Scholar
Proffitt, D. R. (2006) Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science 1:110–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proffitt, D. R. & Linkenauger, S. A. (2013) Perception viewed as a phenotypic expression. In: Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline, ed. Prinz, W., Beisert, M. & Herwig, A., pp. 171–98. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Proffitt, D. R., Stefanucci, J. K., Banton, T. & Epstein, W. (2003) The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science 14:106–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pylyshyn, Z. (1999) Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(3):341–65.Google Scholar
Radel, R. & Clément-Guillotin, C. (2012) Evidence of motivational influences in early visual perception: Hunger modulates conscious access. Psychological Science 23:232–34.Google Scholar
Raftopoulos, A. (2001a) Is perception informationally encapsulated? The issue of the theory-ladenness of perception. Cognitive Science 25:423–51.Google Scholar
Raftopoulos, A. (2001b) Reentrant neural pathways and the theory-ladenness of perception. Philosophy of Science 68:S187–99.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. (1988) Perception of shape from shading. Nature 331:163–66.Google Scholar
Riccio, M., Cole, S. & Balcetis, E. (2013) Seeing the expected, the desired, and the feared: Influences on perceptual interpretation and directed attention. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 7:401–14.Google Scholar
Riener, C. R., Stefanucci, J. K., Proffitt, D. R. & Clore, G. L. (2011) An effect of mood on the perception of geographical slant. Cognition and Emotion 25:174–82.Google Scholar
Riskind, J. H., Moore, R. & Bowley, L. (1995) The looming of spiders: The fearful perceptual distortion of movement and menace. Behaviour Research and Therapy 33:171–78.Google Scholar
Rock, I. (1983) The logic of perception. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rolfs, M., Dambacher, M. & Cavanagh, P. (2013) Visual adaptation of the perception of causality. Current Biology 23(3):250–54. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.12.017.Google Scholar
Rolls, E. T. (2008) Top–down control of visual perception: Attention in natural vision. Perception 37:333–54.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. & Rubin, D. B. (1978) Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1:377–86.Google Scholar
Rust, N. C., Mante, V., Simoncelli, E. P. & Movshon, J. A. (2006) How MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns. Nature Neuroscience 9:1421–31.Google Scholar
Schnall, S., Zadra, J. R. & Proffitt, D. R. (2010) Direct evidence for the economy of action: Glucose and the perception of geographical slant. Perception 39:464–82.Google Scholar
Scholl, B. J. (2001) Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition 80:1–46.Google Scholar
Scholl, B. J. & Gao, T. (2013) Perceiving animacy and intentionality: Visual processing or higher-level judgment? In: Social perception: Detection and interpretation of animacy, agency, and intention, ed. Rutherford, M. D. & Kuhlmeier, V. A., pp. 197–230. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Scholl, B. J. & Leslie, A. M. (1999) Modularity, development and “theory of mind.” Mind and Language 14:131–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholl, B. J. & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000) Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4:299–309.Google Scholar
Sekuler, R., Sekuler, A. B. & Lau, R. (1997) Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature 385:308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaffer, D. M. & Flint, M. (2011) Escalating slant: Increasing physiological potential does not reduce slant overestimates. Psychological Science 22:209–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, D. M., McManama, E., Swank, C. & Durgin, F. H. (2013) Sugar and space? Not the case: Effects of low blood glucose on slant estimation are mediated by beliefs. i-Perception 4:147–55.Google Scholar
Shams, L., Kamitani, Y. & Shimojo, S. (2000) Illusions: What you see is what you hear. Nature 408:788.Google Scholar
Shams, L., Kamitani, Y. & Shimojo, S. (2002) Visual illusion induced by sound. Cognitive Brain Research 14:147–52.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (2012) Cognitive penetrability and perceptual justification. Noûs 46:201–22.Google Scholar
Simons, D. J. (1996) In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological Science 7:301–305.Google Scholar
Simons, D. J. & Chabris, C. F. (1999) Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28:1059–74.Google Scholar
Sklar, A., Levy, N., Goldstein, A., Mandel, R., Maril, A. & Hassin, R. (2012) Reading and doing arithmetic nonconsciously. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109:19614–19.Google Scholar
Song, H., Vonasch, A. J., Meier, B. P. & Bargh, J. A. (2012) Brighten up: Smiles facilitate perceptual judgment of facial lightness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48:450–52.Google Scholar
Stefanucci, J. K., Gagnon, K. T. & Lessard, D. A. (2011) Follow your heart: Emotion adaptively influences perception. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 5:296–308.Google Scholar
Stefanucci, J. K., Gagnon, K. T., Tompkins, C. L. & Bullock, K. E. (2012) Plunging into the pool of death: Imagining a dangerous outcome influences distance perception. Perception 41:1–11.Google Scholar
Stefanucci, J. K. & Geuss, M. N. (2009) Big people, little world: The body influences size perception. Perception 38:1782–95.Google Scholar
Stefanucci, J. K. & Proffitt, D. R. (2009) The roles of altitude and fear in the perception of height. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35:424–38.Google Scholar
Stefanucci, J. K. & Storbeck, J. J. (2009) Don't look down: Emotional arousal elevates height perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138:131–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stokes, D. (2013) Cognitive penetrability of perception. Philosophy Compass 8:646–63.Google Scholar
Stokes, D. (2014) Cognitive penetration and the perception of art. Dialectica 68:1–34.Google Scholar
Storbeck, J. & Clore, G. L. (2008) Affective arousal as information: How affective arousal influences judgments, learning, and memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2:1824–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storbeck, J. & Stefanucci, J. K. (2014) Conditions under which arousal does and does not elevate height estimates. PLoS ONE 9:e92024.Google Scholar
Sugovic, M. & Witt, J. K. (2013) An older view on distance perception: Older adults perceive walkable extents as farther. Experimental Brain Research 226:383–91.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. E. T., Witt, J. K. & Sugovic, M. (2011) When walls are no longer barriers: Perception of wall height in parkour. Perception 40:757–60.Google Scholar
Teachman, B. A., Stefanucci, J. K., Clerkin, E. M., Cody, M. W. & Proffitt, D. R. (2008) A new mode of fear expression: Perceptual bias in height fear. Emotion 8:296–301.Google Scholar
Toppino, T. C. (2003) Reversible-figure perception: Mechanisms of intentional control. Perception and Psychophysics 65:1285–95.Google Scholar
Tse, P. U. (2005) Voluntary attention modulates the brightness of overlapping transparent surfaces. Vision Research 45:1095–98.Google Scholar
Tse, P. U. & Cavanagh, P. (2000) Chinese and Americans see opposite apparent motions in a Chinese character. Cognition 74:B27–32.Google Scholar
van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Stroebe, W. & Aarts, H. (2011) Through the eyes of dieters: Biased size perception of food following tempting food primes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47:293–99.Google Scholar
van Ulzen, N. R., Semin, G. R., Oudejans, R. R. D. & Beek, P. J. (2008) Affective stimulus properties influence size perception and the Ebbinghaus illusion. Psychological Research 72:304–10.Google Scholar
Vetter, P. & Newen, A. (2014) Varieties of cognitive penetration in visual perception. Consciousness and Cognition 27:62–75.Google Scholar
Vickery, T. J., Chun, M. M. & Lee, D. (2011) Ubiquity and specificity of reinforcement signals throughout the human brain. Neuron 72:166–77.Google Scholar
Wakslak, C. J. & Kim, B. K. (2015) Controllable objects seem closer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144:522–27.Google Scholar
Ward, E. J. & Scholl, B. J. (2015) Inattentional blindness reflects limitations on perception, not memory: Evidence from repeated failures of awareness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 22:722–27.Google Scholar
Webster, M. A. & Kay, P. (2012) Color categories and color appearance. Cognition 122:375–92.Google Scholar
Wesp, R., Cichello, P., Gracia, E. B. & Davis, K. (2004) Observing and engaging in purposeful actions with objects influences estimates of their size. Perception and Psychophysics 66:1261–67.Google Scholar
Wesp, R. & Gasper, J. (2012) Is size misperception of targets simply justification for poor performance? Perception 41:994–96.Google Scholar
Witt, J. K. (2011a) Action's effect on perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20:201–206.Google Scholar
Witt, J. K. (2011b) Tool use influences perceived shape and perceived parallelism, which serve as indirect measures of perceived distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 37:1148–56.Google Scholar
Witt, J. K. & Dorsch, T. E. (2009) Kicking to bigger uprights: Field goal kicking performance influences perceived size. Perception 38:1328–40.Google Scholar
Witt, J. K., Linkenauger, S. A., Bakdash, J. Z. & Proffitt, D. R. (2008) Putting to a bigger hole: Golf performance relates to perceived size. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15:581–85.Google Scholar
Witt, J. K. & Proffitt, D. R. (2005) See the ball, hit the ball. Psychological Science 16:937–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D. R. & Epstein, W. (2004) Perceiving distance: A role of effort and intent. Perception 33:577–90.Google Scholar
Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D. R. & Epstein, W. (2005) Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31:880–88.Google Scholar
Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D. R. & Epstein, W. (2010) When and how are spatial perceptions scaled? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 36:1153–60.Google Scholar
Witt, J. K. & Sugovic, M. (2010) Performance and ease influence perceived speed. Perception 39(10):1341–53. doi:10.1068/P6699.Google Scholar
Witt, J. K., Schuck, D. M. & Taylor, J. E. T. (2011) Action-specific effects underwater. Perception 40:530–37.Google Scholar
Witzel, C., Valkova, H., Hansen, T. & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2011) Object knowledge modulates colour appearance. i-Perception 2(1):13–49.Google Scholar
Woods, A. J., Philbeck, J. W. & Danoff, J. V. (2009) The various perceptions of distance: An alternative view of how effort affects distance judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35:1104–17.Google Scholar
Yantis, S. (2013) Sensation and perception. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Yee, E., Ahmed, S. Z. & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2012) Colorless green ideas (can) prime furiously. Psychological Science 23:364–69.Google Scholar
Zadra, J. R. & Clore, G. L. (2011) Emotion and perception: The role of affective information. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2:676–85.Google Scholar
Zeimbekis, J. & Raftopoulos, A., eds. (2015) Cognitive effects on perception: New philosophical perspectives. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, S., Xu, M., Kamigaki, T., Hoang Do, J. P., Chang, W. C. & Jenvay, S. et al. (2014) Long-range and local circuits for top-down modulation of visual cortex processing. Science 345:660–65.Google Scholar