Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T10:35:11.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Donald Campbell's doubt: Cultural difference or failure of communication?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2010

Richard A. Shweder
Richard A. Shweder
Affiliation:
Department of Comparative Human Development, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637. rshd@uchicago.eduhttp://humdev.uchicago.edu/people/faculty/shweder.shtml
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objection, rightfully noted but then dismissed by Henrich et al., that the observed variation across populations “may be due to various methodological artifacts that arise from translating experiments across contexts” is a theoretically profound and potentially constructive criticism. It parallels Donald Campbell's concern that many cultural differences reported by psychologists “come from failures of communication misreported as differences.” Ironically, Campbell's doubt is a good foundation for investigations in cultural psychology.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 2-3 , June 2010 , pp. 109 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, D. T. (1996) Can we overcome worldview incommensurability/relativity in trying to understand the other? In: Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry, ed. Jessor, R., Colby, A. & Shweder, R. A., pp. 153–72. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1996) Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C. F., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Henrich, N. S., Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F. W., Patton, J. Q. & Tracer, D. (2005a) “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(6):795–815; discussion 815–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mead, M. (1932) An investigation of the thought of primitive children, with special reference to animism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 62:173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1929) The child's conception of the world. Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. (1990) Cultural psychology: What is it? In: Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development, ed. Stigler, J., Shweder, R. A. & Herdt, G., pp. 1–46. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. (1991) Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. (2003) Why do men barbecue?: Recipes for cultural psychology. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Titchener, E. B. (1916) On ethnological tests of sensation and perception with special reference to tests of color vision and tactile discrimination described in the reports of the Cambridge anthropological expedition to Torres Straits. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 55:204–36.Google Scholar