Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:52:25.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Goodness has nothing to do with it: Why problem orientation need not make for parochial theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2004

Carol Slater*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Alma College, Alma, MI48801

Abstract:

Social-cognitive psychologists' problem orientation is, in itself, no threat to the generation of normatively neutral general theory. What would put general theory at risk is, rather, the reliance on a valence-balancing explanatory heuristic. Fortunately, social-cognitive research communities have resources to override this heuristic and utilize more epistemically effective cultural tools.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. They are also concerned that the phenomena in question are not as contranormative as claimed, a mistake in judgment that leads to unwarranted gloominess about human nature. This is an interesting but independent issue.

2. Not least because psychologists were typically unaware of the philosophical literature in which these claims appeared.

3. Sampson (1971) suggests that balance theory describes a tendency with substantial adaptive advantages, including provision of “noncontradictory guidelines to action” (p. 131).

4. Were this not the case, K&F themselves would have reason to be profoundly pessimistic about human capacities. It takes more than recognition of their historically adaptive function to make one less gloomy about human hankerings for fat and sugar. You need to know that there are ways to outwit one's craving for crullers.