Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:13:07.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The illusion of mechanism: Mechanistic fundamentalism or enlightenment?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2011

Dennis Norris
Dennis Norris
Affiliation:
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom. dennis.norris@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.ukhttp://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/dennis.norris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rather than worrying about Bayesian Fundamentalists, I suggest that our real concern should be with Mechanistic Fundamentalists; that is, those who believe that concrete, but frequently untestable mechanisms, should be at the heart of all cognitive theories.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , August 2011 , pp. 208 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. R. (1990) The adaptive character of thought. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marr, D. (1982) Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, Y., Jones, M. & Love, B. C. (2008) Putting the psychology back into psychological models: Mechanistic versus rational approaches. Memory and Cognition 36(6):1057–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed