No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Reciprocity and uncertainty
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2012
Abstract
Guala points to a discrepancy between strong negative reciprocity observed in the lab and the way cooperation is sustained “in the wild.” This commentary suggests that in lab experiments, strong negative reciprocity is limited when uncertainty exists regarding the players' actions and the intentions. Thus, costly punishment is indeed a limited mechanism for sustaining cooperation in an uncertain environment.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
References
Axelrod, R. & Dion, D. (1988) The further evolution of cooperation. Science
242(4884):1385–90.Google Scholar
Bendor, J. (1993) Uncertainty and the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Conflict Resolution
37(4):709.Google Scholar
Bereby-Meyer, Y. & Roth, A. E. (2006) The speed of learning in noisy games: Partial reinforcement and the sustainability of cooperation. American Economic Review
96(4):1029–42.Google Scholar
Camerer, C. (2003) Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Croson, R. T. A. (1996) Information in ultimatum games: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
30(2):197–212.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. (2000b) Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives
14(3):159–81.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. & Gintis, H. (2007) Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical foundations. Annual Review of Sociology
33:43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrig, T., Güth, W., Levati, V., Levinsky, R., Ockenfels, A. & Uske, T. (2007) Buying a pig in a poke: An experimental study of unconditional veto power. Journal of Economic Psychology
28(6):692–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, E. J. & Porter, R. H. (1984) Noncooperative collusion under imperfect price information. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society
52(1) 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R. & Schwarze, B. (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
3(4):367–88. Available at:
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0167268182900117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunreuther, H., Silvasi, G., Bradlow, E. T. & Small, D. (2009) Deterministic and stochastic prisoner's dilemma games: Experiments in interdependent security. Judgment and Decision Making
4(5):363–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, D. M., Allison, S. T. & Samuelson, C. D. (1988) Framing and communication effects on group members' responses to environmental and social uncertainty. In: Applied behavioral economics, ed. Maital, S., pp. 677–700. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mitzkewitz, M. & Nagel, R. (1993) Experimental results on ultimatum games with incomplete information. International Journal of Game Theory
22(2):171–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabin, M. (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review
83(5):1281–302.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A., Sundali, J. A. & Seale, D. A. (1996) Ultimatums in two-person bargaining with one-sided uncertainty: Demand games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
30(2):173–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainty, B. (1999) Achieving greater cooperation in a noisy prisoner's dilemma: An experimental investigation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
39(4):421–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Reciprocity and uncertainty
Related commentaries (1)
Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate