Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:34:06.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The reinterpretation hypothesis: Explanation or redescription?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

José Luis Bermúdez
Affiliation:
Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology Program, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130. bermudez@wustl.edu

Abstract

Penn et al. propose the relational reinterpretation hypothesis as an explanation of the profound discontinuities that they identify between human and nonhuman cognition. This hypothesis is not a genuine replacement for the explanations that they reject, however, because as it stands, it simply redescribes the phenomena it is trying to explain.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright ©Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bermúdez, J. L. (2005) Philosophy of psychology: A contemporary introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2002) The cognitive functions of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25(6):657726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennett, D. C. (1996) Kinds of minds: Toward an understanding of consciousness, 1st edition.Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition 28:371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mithen, S. (1996) The prehistory of the mind. Hudson.Google Scholar