Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:19:07.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seeing and talking: Whorf wouldn't be satisfied

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2005

Boris Kotchoubey
Boris Kotchoubey*
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germanyhttp://www.uni-tuebingen.de/medizinischepsychologie/stuff/
*
boris.kotchoubey@uni-tuebingen.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although Steeles & Belpaeme’s (S&B) results may be useful for development of technical devices, their significance for behavioral sciences is very limited. This is because the question the authors asked was “Why do people use similar words in a similar way?” rather than “How can similar words stand for similar experience?” The main problem is not shared word usage, but shared references.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , August 2005 , pp. 502 - 503
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Supplementary material: PDF

Download undefined(PDF)
PDF 1.4 MB