No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Visual perceptual limitations on letter position uncertainty in reading
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 August 2012
Abstract
Frost presents an explanatory theory of reading that generalizes across several languages, based on a revised role of orthographic coding. Perceptual and psychophysical evidence indicates a decay of letter position encoding as a function of the eccentricity of letters (crowding); this factor may account for some of the differences in the languages considered by Frost.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
References
Changizi, M. A., Zhang, Q., Ye, H. & Shimojo, S. (2006) The structures of letters and symbols throughout human history are selected to match those found in objects in natural scenes. The American Naturalist
167:117–39.Google Scholar
Legge, G. E., Ahn, S. J., Klitz, T. S. & Luebker, A. (1997) Psychophysics of reading: XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision. Vision Research
37:1999–2010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legge, G. E. & Bigelow, C. A. (2011) Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography. Journal of Vision
11
(5):8, 1–22. doi:10.1167/11.5.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legge, G. E., Mansfield, J. S. & Chung, S. T. L. (2001) Psychophysics of reading XX: Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research
41(6):725–43.Google Scholar
Nandy, A. S. & Tjan, B. S. (2007) The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images. Journal of Vision
7:1–26.Google Scholar
Parkes, L., Lund, J., Angelucci, A., Solomon, J. A. & Morgan, M. (2001) Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nature Neuroscience
4:739–44.Google Scholar
Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M. & Majaj, N. J. (2004) Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision
4:1136–69.Google Scholar
Pelli, D. G. & Tillman, K. A. (2007) Parts, wholes, and context in reading: A triple dissociation. PLoS ONE
2(8):e680. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000680. Available at: http://www.plosone.org/doi/pone.0000680.Google Scholar
Pelli, D. G., Tillman, K. A., Freeman, J., Su, M., Berger, T. D. & Majaj, N. J. (2007) Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of Vision
7(2):20, 1–36. Available at: http://journalofvision.org/7/2/20/.Google Scholar
Popple, A. V. & Levi, D. M. (2005) The perception of spatial order at a glance. Vision Research
45:1085–90.Google Scholar
Rayner, K. & McConkie, G. (1976) What guides a reader's eye movements?
Vision Research
16:829–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
Towards a universal model of reading
Related commentaries (33)
Thru but not wisht: Language, writing, and universal reading theory
An even more universal model of reading: Various effects of orthography on dyslexias
Are there universals of reading? We don't believe so
Beyond isolated word recognition
Beyond one-way streets: The interaction of phonology, morphology, and culture with orthography
Bringing development into a universal model of reading
Can evolution provide perfectly optimal solutions for a universal model of reading?
Consideration of the linguistic characteristics of letters makes the universal model of reading more universal
Developing a universal model of reading necessitates cracking the orthographic code
Does a focus on universals represent a new trend in word recognition?
Explaining word recognition, reading, the universe, and beyond: A modest proposal
Flashing out or fleshing out? A developmental perspective on a universal model of reading
Flexible letter-position coding is unlikely to hold for morphologically rich languages
Frost and fogs, or sunny skies? Orthography, reading, and misplaced optimalism
Giving theories of reading a sporting chance
No reason to expect “reading universals”
Orthographic consistency and parafoveal preview benefit: A resource-sharing account of language differences in processing of phonological and semantic codes
Orthographic processing is universal; it's what you do with it that's different
Perceptual uncertainty is a property of the cognitive system
Phono-morpho-orthographic construal: The view from spelling
Position-invariant letter identification is a key component of any universal model of reading
Rethinking phonological theories of reading
The case of the neglected alphasyllabary: Orthographic processing in Devanagari
The limitations of the reverse-engineering approach to cognitive modeling
The study of orthographic processing has broadened research in visual word recognition
Theories of reading should predict reading speed
Towards a universal neurobiological architecture for learning to read
Universals of reading: Developmental evidence for linguistic plausibility
Vision, development, and bilingualism are fundamental in the quest for a universal model of visual word recognition and reading
Visual perceptual limitations on letter position uncertainty in reading
Visual word recognition models should also be constrained by knowledge about the visual system
What and where is the word?
Writing systems: Not optimal, but good enough
Author response
A universal approach to modeling visual word recognition and reading: Not only possible, but also inevitable