Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:47:57.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

At least some electrophysiological and behavioural data cannot be reconciled with the planning–control model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2004

P. Paolo Battaglini ,
Paolo Bernardis  and
Nicola Bruno
P. Paolo Battaglini*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Fisiologia e Patologia and BRAIN Center for Neuroscience, Università di Trieste, 34143Trieste, Italyhttp://www.units.it/~brain/
Paolo Bernardis*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Psicologia and BRAIN Center for Neuroscience, Università di Trieste, 34143Trieste, Italy
Nicola Bruno*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Psicologia and BRAIN Center for Neuroscience, Università di Trieste, 34143Trieste, Italy
*
battagli@univ.trieste.it
bernardis@psicoserver.univ.trieste.it
nick@psico.univ.trieste.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The planning/control distinction is an important tool in the study of sensorimotor transformations. However, published data from our laboratories suggest that, contrary to what is predicted by the proposed model, (1) structures in the superior parietal lobe of both monkeys and humans can be involved in movement planning; and (2) fast pointing actions can be immune to visual illusions even if they are performed without visual feedback. The planning–control model as proposed by Glover is almost certainly too schematic.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 24 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)