Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T02:08:07.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beliefs, intentions, and evolution: Old versus new psychological game theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2003

Jeffrey P. Carpenter  and
Peter Hans Matthews
Jeffrey P. Carpenter*
Affiliation:
Economics Department, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT05753http://community.middlebury.edu/~jcarpent/http://community.middlebury.edu/~pmatthew/
Peter Hans Matthews*
Affiliation:
Economics Department, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT05753http://community.middlebury.edu/~jcarpent/http://community.middlebury.edu/~pmatthew/
*
jpc@middlebury.edu
peter.h.matthews@middlebury.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We compare Colman's proposed “psychological game theory” with the existing literature on psychological games (Geanakoplos et al. 1989), in which beliefs and intentions assume a prominent role. We also discuss experimental evidence on intentions, with a particular emphasis on reciprocal behavior, as well as recent efforts to show that such behavior is consistent with social evolution.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 158 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)