Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:10:24.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond rationality: Counterfactual thinking and behavior regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2008

Kai Epstude  and
Neal J. Roese
Kai Epstude
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820. epstude@uiuc.eduroese@uiuc.edu
Neal J. Roese
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820. epstude@uiuc.eduroese@uiuc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Counterfactual thinking may be described as disciplined, realistic, and rational, but we move a step further to describe a theoretical perspective centering on behavior regulation. According to this perspective, counterfactual thinking primarily centers on coordination of ongoing behavior. In short, most “if only” thoughts in daily life center on the acquisition of goals; hence, counterfactual thinking may be illuminated by considering the large literature on goal cognition.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 5-6 , December 2007 , pp. 457 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brandstätter, V., Lengfelder, A. & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2001) Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81:946–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, R. M. J. (2005) The rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1998) On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coricelli, G., Critchley, H. D., Joffily, M., O'Doherty, J. P., Sirigu, A. & Dolan, R. J. (2005) Regret and its avoidance: A neuroimaging study of choice behavior. Nature Neuroscience 8:1255–62.Google Scholar
Epstude, K. & Roese, N. J.(submitted)The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review.Google Scholar
Fishbach, A. & Ferguson, M. J. (2007) The goal construct in social psychology. In: Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2nd edition, ed. Kruglanski, A. W. & Higgins, E. T., pp. 490–515. Guilford.Google Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Moskowitz, G. B. & Skurnik, I. W. (2000) Counterfactuals as self-generated primes: The effect of prior counterfactual activation on person perception judgments. Social Cognition 18:252–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (2006) Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review 113:439–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) Mental models. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Miller, D. (1986) Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review 93:136–53.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1982) The simulation heuristic. In: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, ed. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A., pp. 201–208. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocovski, N. L., Endler, N. S., Rector, N. A. & Flett, G. L. (2005) Ruminative coping and post-event processing in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy 43:971–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewin, K. (1935) A dynamic theory of personality. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Markman, K. D., McMullen, M. N., Elizaga, R. A. & Mizoguchi, N. (2006) Counterfactual thinking and regulatory fit. Judgment and Decision Making 1 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, K. D. & Miller, A. K. (2006) Depression, control and counterfactual thinking: Functional for whom? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 25:210–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasco, S. A. & Marsh, K. L. (1999) Gaining control through counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25:556–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roese, N. J. (1994) The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:805–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roese, N. J. (1997) Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin 121:133–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roese, N. J. (2005) If only. Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Roese, N. J. & Hur, T. (1997) Affective determinants in counterfactual thinking. Social Cognition 15:274–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roese, N. J., Hur, T. & Pennington, G. L. (1999) Counterfactual thinking and regulatory focus: Implications for action versus inaction and sufficiency versus necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77:1109–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roese, N. J. & Olson, J. M. (1997) Counterfactual thinking: The intersection of affect and function. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 29, ed. Zanna, M. P., pp. 1–59. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Roese, N. J., Park, S., Smallman, R. & Gibson, C.(in press)Schizophrenia involves impairment in the activation of intentions by counterfactual thinking. Schizophrenia Research.Google Scholar
Summerville, A. & Roese, N. J.(in press)Dare to compare: Fact based versus simulation based comparison in daily life. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.Google Scholar
Ursu, S. & Carter, S. T. (2005) Outcome representations, counterfactual comparisons and the human orbitofrontal cortex: Implications for neuroimaging studies of decision-making. Cognitive Brain Research 34:51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, K. & Roese, N. J.(submitted)The social side of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.Google Scholar
Zeelenberg, M. & Pieters, R. (2007) A theory of regret regulation 1.0. Journal of Consumer Psychology 17:3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar