Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:26:06.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chow's defense of null-hypothesis testing: Too traditional?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1998

Robert W. Frick
Robert W. Frick
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11790 rfrick@sunysb.edu www.psy.sunysb.edu/rfrick/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I disagree with several of Chow's traditional descriptions and justifications of null hypothesis testing: (1) accepting the null hypothesis whenever p > .05; (2) random sampling from a population; (3) the frequentist interpretation of probability; (4) having the null hypothesis generate both a probability distribution and a complement of the desired conclusion; (5) assuming that researchers must fix their sample size before performing their study.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , April 1998 , pp. 199
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)