No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The contribution of comparative research to the development and testing of life history models of human attachment and reproductive strategies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2009
Abstract
Research with nonhuman primates can make important contributions to life history models of human attachment and reproductive strategies, such as: including parental responsiveness into female reproductive strategies, testing the assumption that adult attachment is a reproductive adaptation, assessing genetic and environmental effects on attachment and reproduction, and investigating the mechanisms through which early stress results in accelerated reproductive maturation.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
References
Clutton-Brock, T. H., ed. (1988) Reproductive success: Studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kappeler, P. M. & Pereira, M. E., eds. (2003) Primate life histories and socioecology. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maestripieri, D. (2003) Attachment. In: Primate psychology, ed. Maestripieri, D., pp. 108–43. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maestripieri, D. (2005a) Effects of early experience on female behavioural and reproductive development in rhesus macaques. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272:1243–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Maestripieri, D. (2005b) On the importance of comparative research for the understanding of human behavior and development: A reply to Gottlieb & Lickliter (2004). Social Development 14:181–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maestripieri, D. & Roney, J. R. (2006) Evolutionary developmental psychology: Contributions from comparative research with nonhuman primates. Developmental Review 26:120–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maestripieri, D., Roney, J. R., DeBias, N., Durante, K. M. & Spaepen, G. M. (2004) Father absence, menarche, and interest in infants among adolescent girls. Developmental Science 7:560–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roney, J. R. & Maestripieri, D. (2002) The importance of comparative and phylogenetic analyses in the study of adaptation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25:525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar