No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Convergent cultural evolution may explain linguistic universals
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 October 2008
Abstract
Christiansen & Chater's (C&C's) argument rests on an assumption that convergent cultural evolution can produce similar (complex) behaviours in isolated populations. In this commentary, I describe how experiments recently carried out by Caldwell and colleagues can contribute to the understanding of such phenomena.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008
References
Caldwell, C. A. & Millen, A. E. (2008) Experimental models for testing hypotheses about cumulative cultural evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior 29:165–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, T. W. (1997) The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. W. W. Norton/Penguin.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. W. (2003a) Universal grammar and semiotic constraints. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. W. (2003b) Multilevel selection in a complex adaptive system: The problem of language origins. In: Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered, ed. Weber, B. H. & Depew, D. J.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, A. (2007) Using the methods of experimental social psychology to study cultural evolution. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology 1:35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesoudi, A. (2008) Foresight in cultural evolution. Biology and Philosophy 23:243–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesoudi, A. & O'Brien, M. J. (2008) The cultural transmission of Great Basin projectile-point technology I: An experimental simulation. American Antiquity 73:3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A. & Laland, K. N. (2004) Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence reviewed from the perspective of The Origin of Species. Evolution 58:1–11.Google Scholar