Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T23:08:33.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diachronic evidence for a dual-mechanism approach to inflection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1999

David Fertig
David Fertig
Affiliation:
Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14226 fertig@acsu.buffalo.edu wings.buffalo.edu/cas/mll/lunz/home.htm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The received view in historical linguistics is that there is always an inverse relation between token frequency and likelihood of analogical change. I have found evidence, however, of a sharp difference in frequency effects between regularization and nonregularizing analogical change. I argue that this difference can easily be accounted for by dual-mechanism models of inflection but is very problematic for pure associative-memory models.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 6 , December 1999 , pp. 1023 - 1024
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)