Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:39:07.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fixed versus flexible strategists: Individual differences in facultative responsiveness?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

Jay Belsky
Jay Belsky
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Birkbeck College, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdomj.belsky@psychology.bbk.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gangestad & Simpson's central premise regarding individual differences is applied to their facultative-argument based on mating- strategy, for individual differences in susceptibility to contextual effects. Some individuals may be relatively fixed strategists who are rather unresponsive to context when it comes to mating, whereas others, perhaps most, may be, as G&S propose, flexible strategists.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , August 2000 , pp. 591 - 592
Copyright
2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)