Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T18:10:23.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Getting the constraints right

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2010

Patrick McConvell
Patrick McConvell
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. Patrick.McConvell@anu.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While the idea of applying Optimality Theory to kinship has potential, this commentary draws attention to problems with the constraints proposed. Particularly, Distinguish Matrikin appears to recapitulate an error of linking matrilineal descent to Iroquois kinship too closely and more generally mixing descent with true kinship parameters.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 5 , October 2010 , pp. 394 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anttila, A. & Young-Mee, Y. C. (1998) Variation and change in optimality theory. Lingua 104:31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronenfeld, D. B. (2009) Fanti kinship and the analysis of kinship terminologies. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, F. G. (1964/1969) The structural analysis of kinship semantics. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists. Reprinted in: Cognitive anthropology: Readings, ed. Tyler, S. A., pp. 193–212. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
McConvell, P. (forthcoming) Omaha skewing in Australia: Overlays, dynamism and change. In: Crossing cousins, marrying aunts, transforming kin: Beyond the Crow-Omaha Paradox, ed. Whiteley, P. & Trautman, T.. University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, H. (1971) Dravidian-Iroquois: The Melanesian evidence. In Anthropology in Oceania, ed. Hiatt, L. R. & Jayawardena, E., pp. 231–54. Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar