Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:49:39.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Graceful degradation and conceptual development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

Frank Keil
Frank Keil
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520. frank.keil@yale.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this book, Carey gives cognitive science a detailed account of the origins of concepts and an explanation of how origins stories are essential to understanding what concepts are and how we use them. At the same time, this book's details help highlight the challenge of explaining how conceptual change works with real-world concepts that often have heavily degraded internal content.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , June 2011 , pp. 133 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carey, S. (2009) The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1998) Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inagaki, K. & Hatano, G. (2002) Young children's naive thinking about the biological world. Psychological Press.Google Scholar
Keil, F. C. (2010) The feasibility of Folk Science. Cognitive Science 34:826–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keil, F. C., Stein, C., Webb, L., Billings, V. D. & Rozenblit, L. (2008) Discerning the division of cognitive labor: An emerging understanding of how knowledge is clustered in other minds. Cognitive Science 32:259–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurence, S. & Margolis, E. (2002) Radical concept nativism. Cognition 86:22–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawson, R. L. (2006) The science of cycology: Failures to understand how everyday objects work. Memory and Cognition 34:1667–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rumelhart, D. E. (1989) The architecture of mind: A connectionist approach. In: Foundations of cognitive science, ed. Posner, M., pp. 133–60. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar