Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T20:38:50.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incorporating semantics and individual differences in models of working memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2003

Janice M. Keenan*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208 http://www.du.edu/~jkeenan
Jukka Hyönä*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland http://users.utu.fi/hyona/ http://users.utu.fi/johkaa/
Johanna K. Kaakinen*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland http://users.utu.fi/hyona/ http://users.utu.fi/johkaa/

Abstract:

Ruchkin et al.'s view of working memory as activated long-term memory is more compatible with language processing than models such as Baddeley's, but it raises questions about individual differences in working memory and the validity of domain-general capacity estimates. Does it make sense to refer to someone as having low working memory capacity if capacity depends on particular knowledge structures tapped by the task?

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
PDF 923.2 KB