Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T08:01:52.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lab support for strong reciprocity is weak: Punishing for reputation rather than cooperation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2012

Alex Shaw  and
Laurie Santos
Alex Shaw
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511. Alex.Shaw@yale.eduLaurie.Santos@yale.eduhttps://sites.google.com/site/alexshawyale/
Laurie Santos
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511. Alex.Shaw@yale.eduLaurie.Santos@yale.eduhttps://sites.google.com/site/alexshawyale/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Strong reciprocity is not the only account that can explain costly punishment in the lab; it can also be explained by reputation-based accounts. We discuss these two accounts and suggest what kinds of evidence would support the two different alternatives. We conclude that the current evidence favors a reputation-based account of costly punishment.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 39
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barclay, P. (2006) Reputational benefits for altruistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior 27:325–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415(6868):137–40. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v415/n6868/abs/415137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fessler, D. M. T. & Haley, K. (2003) The strategy of affect: Emotions in human cooperation. In: Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation, ed. Hammerstein, P., pp. 7–36. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, E. H. & Hammerstein, P. (2006) Game theory and human evolution: A critique of some recent interpretations of experimental games. Theoretical Population Biology 69:339–48. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0040580905001668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J. & Fehr, E. (2003) Is strong reciprocity a maladaptation? On the evolutionary foundations of human altruism. In: Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation, ed. Hammerstein, P., pp. 55–82. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., DeScioli, P. & O'Brien, E. (2007) Audience effects on moralistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior 28:75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelissen, R. M. A. (2008) The price you pay: Cost-dependent reputation effects of altruistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior 29:242–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piazza, J. & Bering, J. M. (2008b) The effects of perceived anonymity on altruistic punishment. Evolutionary Psychology 6:487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, M. E. (2008) The resurrection of group selection as a theory of human cooperation. Social Justice Research 21:228–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, M. D., Rankin, D. J. & Wedekind, C. (2011) The evolution of punishment through reputation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278:371–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorndike, E. L. (1927) The law of effect. American Journal of Psychology 39:212–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J., Krasnow, M., Delton, A. & Cosmides, L. (2009) I will only know that our interaction was one-shot if I kill you: A cue theoretic approach to the architecture of cooperation. Talk presented at the Human Behavior and Evolution Society Meeting, California State University, Fullerton, CA, May 2009.Google Scholar