Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:09:06.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mechanisms responsible for the flash-lag effect cannot provide the motor prediction that we need in daily life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

Jeroen B. J. Smeets  and
Eli Brenner
Jeroen B. J. Smeets
Affiliation:
Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.smeets@fbw.vu.nle.brenner@fbw.vu.nlhttp://www.fbw.vu.nl/~JSmeets/
Eli Brenner
Affiliation:
Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.smeets@fbw.vu.nle.brenner@fbw.vu.nlhttp://www.fbw.vu.nl/~JSmeets/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The visual prediction that Nijhawan proposes cannot explain why the flash-lag effect depends on what happens after the flash. Moreover, using a visual prediction based on retinal image motion to compensate for neuronal time delays will seldom be of any use for motor control, because one normally pursues objects with which one intends to interact with ones eyes.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 215 - 216
Copyright
Copyright ©Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, G. R. & Asselman, P. T. (1991) The mechanism of prediction in human smooth pursuit eye-movements. Journal of Physiology 439:439–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenner, E. & Smeets, J. B. (2000) Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research 40(13):1645–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, E. & Smeets, J. B. (2007) Eye movements in a spatially and temporally demanding interception task. Journal of Vision 7(9):565.Google Scholar
Collewijn, H. & Tamminga, E. P. (1984) Human smooth and saccadic eye movements during voluntary pursuit of different target motions on different backgrounds. Journal of Physiology 351:217–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagleman, D. M. & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000) Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287(5460):2036–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koken, P. W. & Erkelens, C. J. (1992) Influences of hand movements on eye movements in tracking tasks in man. Experimental Brain Research 88:657–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Land, M. F. & McLeod, P. (2000) From eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball. Nature Neuroscience 3(12):1340–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mrotek, L. A. & Soechting, J. F. (2007) Target interception: Hand-eye coordination and strategies. Journal of Neuroscience 27(27):7297–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Regan, J. K. & Noe, A. (2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(5):939–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smeets, J. B. J. & Bekkering, H. (2000) Prediction of saccadic amplitude during smooth pursuit eye movements. Human Movement Science 19(3):275–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thier, P. & Ilg, U. J. (2005) The neural basis of smooth-pursuit eye movements. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 15(6):645–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Berg, A. V. (1988) Human smooth pursuit during transient perturbations of predictable and unpredictable target movement. Experimental Brain Research 72:95–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitney, D. & Murakami, I. (1998) Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience 1(8):656–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar