Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
2000.
Leçons de parole.
p.
299.
Slowiaczek, Louisa M
McQueen, James M
Soltano, Emily G
and
Lynch, Michelle
2000.
Phonological Representations in Prelexical Speech Processing: Evidence from Form-Based Priming.
Journal of Memory and Language,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 3,
p.
530.
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan M.
Zeelenberg, René
Schooler, Lael J.
and
Raaijmakers, Jeroen G. W.
2000.
A criterion-shift model for enhanced discriminability in perceptual identification: A note on the counter model.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 4,
p.
718.
Hallé, Pierre A
Chéreau, Céline
and
Segui, Juan
2000.
Where Is the /b/ in “absurde” [apsyrd]? It Is in French Listeners' Minds.
Journal of Memory and Language,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 4,
p.
618.
Gaskell, M. Gareth
2001.
Phonological variation and its consequences for the word recognition system.
Language and Cognitive Processes,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 5-6,
p.
723.
Allen, J. Sean
and
Miller, Joanne L.
2001.
Contextual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories: A distinction between lexical status and speaking rate.
Perception & Psychophysics,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 5,
p.
798.
Chater, Nick
and
Christiansen, Morten H.
2001.
The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology.
p.
477.
Pulvermüller, F.
2001.
International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.
p.
2580.
Gaskell, M.Gareth
and
Marslen-Wilson, William D.
2001.
Lexical Ambiguity Resolution and Spoken Word Recognition: Bridging the Gap.
Journal of Memory and Language,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 3,
p.
325.
Luce, Paul A.
and
Large, Nathan R.
2001.
Phonotactics, density, and entropy in spoken word recognition.
Language and Cognitive Processes,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 5-6,
p.
565.
Samuel, Arthur G.
2001.
Knowing a Word Affects the Fundamental Perception of The Sounds Within it.
Psychological Science,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 4,
p.
348.
McQueen, James M.
and
Cutler, Anne
2001.
Spoken word access processes: An introduction.
Language and Cognitive Processes,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 5-6,
p.
469.
2001.
The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology.
p.
187.
Bürki-Cohen, Judith
Miller, Joanne L.
and
Eimas, Peter D.
2001.
Perceiving Non-Native Speech.
Language and Speech,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 2,
p.
149.
Vroomen, Jean
and
de Gelder, Beatrice
2001.
Lipreading and the compensation for coarticulation mechanism.
Language and Cognitive Processes,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 5-6,
p.
661.
van Alphen, Petra
and
McQueen, James M.
2001.
The time-limited influence of sentential context of function word identification..
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 5,
p.
1057.
Hay, Jennifer
2001.
Lexical frequency in morphology: is everything relative?.
Linguistics,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 6,
Pierrehumbert, Janet
2001.
Why phonological constraints are so coarse-grained.
Language and Cognitive Processes,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 5-6,
p.
691.
Ramus, Franck
2001.
Outstanding questions about phonological processing in dyslexia.
Dyslexia,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 4,
p.
197.
Dahan, Delphine
Magnuson, James S.
and
Tanenhaus, Michael K.
2001.
Time Course of Frequency Effects in Spoken-Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye Movements.
Cognitive Psychology,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 4,
p.
317.