No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The nature of economical coding is determined by the unique properties of objects in the environment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 April 2008
Abstract
The physical properties that signify objects differ dramatically, so that the organization of sensory systems must reflect those differences. Although all senses may encode peripheral sensory information using across-fiber firing distributions, an economical coding system for each sense will necessarily differ. An economical code must maximize information about objects, whether they are predators or foods.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008
References
Barlow, H. B. (2001) Redundancy reduction revisited. Network: Computation in neural systems 12:241–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Handel, S. (2006) Perceptual coherence: Hearing and seeing. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, D. B., MacAdam, D. L. & Wyszecki, G. (1964) Spectral distribution of typical daylight as a function of correlated color temperature. Journal of the Optical Society of America 54:1031–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewicki, M. S. (2002) Efficient coding of natural sounds. Nature Neuroscience 5:356–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruderman, D. L., Cronin, T. W. & Chiao, C.-C. (1998) Statistics of cone responses to natural images: Implications for visual coding. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A 15:2036–45. 1649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. I. (2007) Neural circuits underlying chemical perception. Science 318:584–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, P., Atkinson, R., Jones, D. N. M. & Smith, D. P. (2005) Drosophila OBP LUSH is required for activity of pherome-sensitive neurons. Neuron 45:193–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, T. (1802) On the theory of light and colours. Philosophical Transactions, Royal Society of London 92:12–48.Google Scholar