Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T10:13:46.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neural reuse and human individual differences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2010

Cristina D. Rabaglia  and
Gary F. Marcus
Cristina D. Rabaglia
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003. rabaglia@nyu.edugary.marcus@nyu.edu
Gary F. Marcus
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003. rabaglia@nyu.edugary.marcus@nyu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We find the theory of neural reuse to be highly plausible, and suggest that human individual differences provide an additional line of argument in its favor, focusing on the well-replicated finding of “positive manifold,” in which individual differences are highly correlated across domains. We also suggest that the theory of neural reuse may be an important contributor to the phenomenon of positive manifold itself.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , August 2010 , pp. 287 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carroll, J. B. (1993) Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, M. C., Barysheva, M., Shattuck, D. W., Lee, A. D., Madsen, S. K., Avedissian, C., Klunder, A. D., Toga, A. W., McMahon, K. L., de Zubicaray, G. I., Wright, M. J., Srivastava, A., Balov, N. & Thompson, P. M. (2009) Genetics of brain fiber architecture and intellectual performance. Journal of Neuroscience 29:2212–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deary, I. J., Penke, L. & Johnson, W. (2010) The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nature: Neuroscience 11:201–11.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J., Spinath, F. M. & Bates, T. C. (2006) Genetics of intelligence. European Journal of Human Genetics 14:690–700.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1998) The suppressed relationship between IQ and the reaction time slope parameter of the Hick function. Intelligence 26:43–52.Google Scholar
Jung, R. E. & Haier, R. J. (2007) The parieto-frontal integration theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30(2):135–54.Google Scholar
Kyllonen, P. C. & Christal, R. E. (1990) Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity? Intelligence 14:389–433.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. F. (2006) Cognitive architecture and descent with modification. Cognition 101:43–65.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. F. & Rabagliati, H. (2006) The nature and origins of language: How studies of developmental disorders could help. Nature Neuroscience 10:1226–29.Google Scholar
Rabaglia, C. D. & Marcus, G. F. (in preparation) Individual differences in sentence comprehension: Beyond working memory.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. (1904) “General intelligence” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology 15:201–93.Google Scholar