Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T23:22:02.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perception, action, and motor control: Interaction does not necessarily imply common structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2002

L. Pisella
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 354, “Espace & Action,” 69676 Bron, Francepisella@lyon151.inserm.frrossetti@lyon151.inserm.fr http://www.lyon151.inserm.fr/unites/534_rossetti.html School of Behavioural Science, Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australiaa.kritikos@psych.unimelb.edu.au
A. Kritikos
Affiliation:
School of Behavioural Science, Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australiaa.kritikos@psych.unimelb.edu.au
Y. Rossetti
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 354, “Espace & Action,” 69676 Bron, Francepisella@lyon151.inserm.frrossetti@lyon151.inserm.fr http://www.lyon151.inserm.fr/unites/534_rossetti.html

Abstract

The Theory of Event Coding (TEC) provides a preliminary account of the interaction between perception and action, which is consistent with several recent findings in the area of motor control. Significant issues require integration and elaboration, however; particularly, distractor interference, automatic motor corrections, internal models of action, and neuroanatomical bases for the link between perception and action.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)