Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T19:45:39.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Person as moralist and scientist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2010

Marcus Vinícius C. Baldo  and
Anouk Barberousse
Marcus Vinícius C. Baldo
Affiliation:
“Roberto Vieira” Laboratory of Sensory Physiology, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, SP 05508-900, São Paulo, Brazil. baldo@usp.brhttp://www.fisio.icb.usp.br/~vinicius
Anouk Barberousse
Affiliation:
Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques (IHPST), UMR 8590, CNRS, Université Paris 1, ENS, 75006 Paris, France. barberou@heraclite.ens.frhttp://www-ihpst.univ-paris1.fr/en/4,anouk_barberousse.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scientific inquiry possibly shares with people's ordinary understanding the same evolutionary determinants, and affect-laden intuitions that shape moral judgments also play a decisive role in decision-making, planning, and scientific reasoning. Therefore, if ordinary understanding does differ from scientific inquiry, the reason does not reside in the fact that the former (but not the latter) is endowed with moral considerations.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , August 2010 , pp. 331
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechara, A., Tranel, D. & Damasio, H. (2000) Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain 123:2189–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eslinger, P. J. & Damasio, A. R. (1985) Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: Patient EVR. Neurology 35:1731–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, A. P. (1992) Four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review 99:689–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gopnik, A. (1996) The scientist as child. Philosophy of Science 63:485–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A. & Schulz, L. (2004) Mechanisms of theory formation in young children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(8):371–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gopnik, A. & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007) Bayesian networks, Bayesian learning and cognitive development. Developmental Science 10(3):281–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. & Haidt, J. (2002) How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(12):517–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108:814–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. (2007) The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science 316:998–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hume, D. (1739/2000) A treatise of human nature. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moll, J., Zahn, R., Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F. & Grafman, J. (2005) The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6:799–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prinz, J. (2006) The emotional basis of moral judgment. Philosophical Explorations 9:29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar