Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T19:28:27.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rocky road from Axis I to Axis II: Extending the network model of diagnostic comorbidity to personality pathology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2010

Robert F. Bornstein
Robert F. Bornstein
Affiliation:
Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11530. bornstein@adelphi.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the network model represents a promising new approach to conceptualizing comorbidity in psychiatric diagnosis, the model applies most directly to Axis I symptom disorders; the degree to which the model generalizes to Axis II disorders remains open to question. This commentary addresses that issue, discussing opportunities and challenges in applying the network model to DSM-diagnosed personality pathology.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 2-3 , June 2010 , pp. 151 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (APA). (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edition, (DSM-IV). American Psychiatric Association/APA Books.Google Scholar
Bornstein, R. F. (1998) Reconceptualizing personality disorder diagnosis in the DSM-V: The discriminant validity challenge. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 5:333–43.Google Scholar
Bornstein, R. F. (2003) Behaviorally referenced experimentation and symptom validation: A paradigm for 21st-century personality disorder research. Journal of Personality Disorders 17:1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bornstein, R. F. (2005) The dependent patient: A practitioner's guide. American Psychiatric Association/APA Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, R. F. (2007) From surface to depth: Diagnosis and assessment in personality pathology. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 14:99–102.Google Scholar
Ekselius, L., Lindstrom, E., Knorring, L., Bodlund, O. & Kullgren, G. (1994) Comorbidity among the personality disorders in DSM-III-R. Personality and Individual Differences 17:155–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, C. P. (1990) The inpatient treatment of severe personality disorders. New Directions for Mental Health Services 47:65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shedler, J. & Westen, D. (1999) Revising and assessing Axis II: Toward an empirically based and clinically useful classification of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 156:258–72.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A. & Clark, L. A. (2000) Toward DSM-V and the classification of personality disorders. Psychological Bulletin 126:946–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widiger, T. A. & Samuel, D. B. (2005) Evidence-based assessment of personality disorders. Psychological Bulletin 17:278–87.Google ScholarPubMed