Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T09:29:56.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Second-order indeterminacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2003

Marco Perugini
Marco Perugini*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQUnited Kingdomhttp://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~mperug
*
mperug@essex.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Psychological game theory, as defined by Colman, is meant to offer a series of solution concepts that should reduce the indeterminacy of orthodox game theory when applied to a series of situations. My main criticism is that, actually, they introduce a second-order indeterminacy problem rather than offering a viable solution. The reason is that the proposed solution concepts are under-specified in their definition and in their scope.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 171 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

1. I owe this example to Tim Rakow.