Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:22:02.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social theory and the cognitive-emotional brain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2015

Marco Verweij  and
Timothy J. Senior
Marco Verweij
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Jacobs University, Bremen 28759, Germany. m.verweij@jacobs-university.dewww.jacobs-university.de/directory/mverweij
Timothy J. Senior
Affiliation:
Digital Cultures Research Centre, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, United Kingdom. Timothy.Senior@uwe.ac.ukwww.art-sci.info
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pessoa's (2013) arguments imply that various leading approaches in the social sciences have not adequately conceptualized how emotion and cognition influence human decision making and social behavior. This is particularly unfortunate, as these approaches have been central to the efforts to build bridges between neuroscience and the social sciences. We argue that it would be better to base these efforts on other social theories that appear more compatible with Pessoa's analysis of the brain.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 38 , 2015 , e88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrecht, K., Volz, K. G., Sutter, M., Laibson, D. I. & von Cramon, Y. (2010) What is for me is not for you: Brain correlates of intertemporal choice for self and other. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 6(2):218–25.Google Scholar
Ariely, D. (2008) Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. Harper.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1976) The economic approach to human behavior. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G. & Prelec, D. (2004) Why economics needs brains. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 106(3):555–79.Google Scholar
Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (1999) Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1994) Descartes' error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. Avon.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (2010) Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. Pantheon.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. & Cohen, L. (2007) Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 56(2):384–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, M., ed. (1982) Essays in the sociology of perception. Routledge.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. & Ney, S. (1998) Missing persons: A critique of personhood in the social sciences. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dow Schüll, N. & Zaloom, C. (2011) The short-sighted brain: Neuroscience and the governance of choice in time. Social Studies of Science 41(4):515–38.Google Scholar
Fiske, A. P. (1991) Structures of social life. The Free Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. & Mcelreath, R. (2001) In search of homo economicus. American Economic Review 91(2):73–78.Google Scholar
Hertwig, R., Hoffrage, U. & the ABC Research Group (2013) Simple heuristics in a social world. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2003b) Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review 93(5):1449–75.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
Keren, G. & Schul, Y. (2009) Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4(6):533–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenigs, M., Young, L. Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M. & Damasio, A. (2007) Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature 446(7138):908–11.Google Scholar
Krajbich, I., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Denburg, N. & Camerer, C. (2009) Economic games quantify diminished sense of guilt in patients with damage to the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 29(7):2188–92.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E. (2000) Emotional circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 23:155–84.Google Scholar
Leiser, D., Bourgeois, S. & Benita, R. (2010) Human foibles or system failure: Lay perceptions of the 2008–2009 financial crisis. The Journal of Socio-Economics 39(2):132–41.Google Scholar
Pessoa, L. (2013) The cognitive-emotional brain. From interactions to integration. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shafir, E., ed. (2012) The behavioral foundations of public policy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (2005) Behavorial economics research and the foundation of economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics 34:135–50.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavorial and Brain Sciences 23:645–726.Google Scholar
Stein, A. (2013) Are people probabilistically challenged? Michigan Law Review 111(6):855–76.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., ed. (2000) Behavioral law & economics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1993) Advances in behavorial finance. Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Thompson, M., Ellis, R. J. & Wildavsky, A. (1990) Cultural theory. Westview.Google Scholar
Turner, R. (2012) The need for systematic ethnopsychology. Anthropological Theory 12(1):29–42.Google Scholar
Volz, K. G. & Gigerenzer, G. (2014) The brain is not “as if”: Taking stock of the neuroscientific approach on decision-making. In: Advanced brain neuroimaging topics in health and disease, ed. Papageorgiou, T. D., Christopoulos, G. I. & Smirnakis, S. M., pp. 573–603. Intech.Google Scholar
Whitehead, C. (2012) Why the behavioural sciences need the culture-ready brain. Anthropological Theory 12(1):43–71.Google Scholar