No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Time for a re-think: Problems with the parallel distributed approach to semantic cognition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 December 2008
Abstract
Rogers & McClelland (R&M) have provided an impressive outline of the capabilities of a class of multi-layered perceptrons that mimic many aspects of human knowledge acquisition. Despite this success, in the literature several basic issues are raised and concerns are expressed. Indeed, the problems are so acute that a different way of thinking is called for. In this commentary it is suggested that rational models approach provides a promising alternative.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008
References
Fodor, J. A. & McLaughlin, B. P. (1990) Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: Why Smolensky's solution doesn't work. Cognition 35:183–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinton, G. E. (1984) Distributed representations. (Technical Report CMU-CS-84–157). Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Rogers, T. T. & McClelland, J. L. (2004) Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steyvers, M., Griffiths, T. L. & Dennis, S. (2006) Probabilistic inference in human semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Science 10:327–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F. & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007a) Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review 114:245–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F. & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007b) Sensitivity to sampling in Bayesian word learning. Developmental Science 10:288–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed