Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:47:32.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

You don't say: Figurative language and thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2003

Gregory A. Bryant  and
Raymond W. Gibbs
Gregory A. Bryant
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Social Sciences II, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064 gbryant@ucsc.edugibbs@ucsc.edu
Raymond W. Gibbs
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Social Sciences II, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064 gbryant@ucsc.edugibbs@ucsc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Carruthers has proposed a novel and quite interesting hypothesis for the role of language in conceptual integration, but his treatment does not acknowledge work in cognitive science on metaphor and analogy that reveals how diverse knowledge structures are integrated. We claim that this body of research provides clear evidence that cross-domain conceptual connections cannot be driven by syntactic processes alone.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 25 , Issue 6 , December 2002 , pp. 678 - 679
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)