Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:44:45.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy Expectations, Training Performance, and Competitive Performance in Women's Artistic Gymnastics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Christina Lee
Christina Lee*
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle
*
Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle, N.S.W. 2308
Get access

Abstract

This paper reports on a study examining the relationships between self-efficacy, training performance, and competitive performance in women's artistic gymnastics. Data were collected during normal training sessions from 16 female competitive gymnasts. Efficacy expectations were somewhat more accurate than were previous competition scores in predicting competitive performance, although training performance was the most accurate predictor. The tracking of performance and efficacy for six gymnasts during the weeks prior to a major competition illustrated the development and interaction of skill level and efficacy expectations. Efficacy measures may provide information on gymnasts' states of readiness for competition, and can be assessed without interfering with normal training.

Type
Articles
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 1986 , pp. 100 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.Google Scholar
Caudill, D., Weinberg, R., & Jackson, A. (1983). Psyching-up and track athletes: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 231–235.Google Scholar
Feltz, D.L., & Mungo, D.A. (1983). A replication of the path analysis of the causal elements in Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and the influence of autonomic perception. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 263–277.Google Scholar
Gould, D., Weiss, M., & Weinberg, R.S. (1981). Psychological characteristics of successful and nonsuccessful Big Ten Wrestlers. Journal of Sport Psychology, 3, 69–81.Google Scholar
Highlen, P.S., & Bennett, B.B. (1983). Elite divers and wrestlers: A comparison between open- and closed-skill athletes. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 390–409.Google Scholar
Lee, C. (1982). Self-efficacy as a predictor of performance in competitive gymnastics. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 405–409.Google Scholar
Mahoney, M.J., & Avener, M. (1977). Psychology of the elite athlete: An exploratory study. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 135–141.Google Scholar
Meyers, A.W., Cooke, C.J.Cullen, J., & Liles, L. (1979). Psychological aspects of athletic competitors: A replication across sports. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3, 361–366.Google Scholar
Nelson, L.R., & Furst, M.L. (1972). An objective study of the effects of expectation on competitive performance. Journal of Psychology, 81, 69–72.Google Scholar
Weinberg, R.S., Gould, D., Yukelson, D., & Jackson, A. (1981). The effect of pre-existing and manipulated self-efficacy on a competitive muscular endurance task. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 345–354.Google Scholar