Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T12:21:59.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accessibility of Diagnostic Categories and Causal Attributions for an Interviewee's Behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Anthony W. Love  and
Henry J. Jackson
Anthony W. Love*
Affiliation:
La Trobe University
Henry J. Jackson
Affiliation:
Royal Park Hospital, Parkville, Victoria
*
Department of Psychology, La Trobe University, Bundoora Vic. 3083
Get access

Abstract

Cognitive factors, such as the accessibility of schematic categories, have been shown to bias interpretation of information about other's behaviour. In this study, the effects of diagnostic category accessibility on subjects' causal attributions for an interviewee's behaviour were investigated. In order to activate a specific diagnostic category, making it more accessible for information encoding, mental health students completed a short test. Half answered questions about victims of rape attacks; the other half answered questions about the diagnosis of histrionic personality disorder. All subjects then rated their attribution for a female interviewee's non-verbal behaviour along four dimensions: Internality, Stability, Globality, and Controllability. Results indicated an interaction between type of course and experimental condition. Psychology undergraduate students in the Rape Victim condition tended to make more stable and global attributions than did Psychiatric Nursing and Masters of Psychological Medicine students. In addition, a significant main effect was found on the Controllability dimension. The subjects in the Personality Disorder condition rated the cause as significantly more controllable than did the subjects in the Rape Victim condition. Implications of the results are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 1988 , pp. 175 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arkes, H. R. (1981). Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 323–330.Google Scholar
Bishop, J. B., Sharf, R. S. & Adkins, D. M. (1975). Counselor intake judgments, client characteristics and number of sessions at a university counseling center. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22, 557–559.Google Scholar
Brickman, P., Rabinowitz, V. C., Karuza, J., Coates, D., Cohen, E. & Kidder, L. (1982). Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist, 37, 369–384.Google Scholar
Cantor, N. & Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypicality and personality: Effects of free recall and personality impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 187–205.Google Scholar
Einhorn, H. J. & Hogarth, R. M. (1978). Confidence in judgments: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychological Review, 85, 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. J. & Rosenthal, R. (1986). Counselor and client personality as determinants of counselor expectancy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 362–369.Google Scholar
Jackson, H. J. & Tierney, D. (1984). On the relationship between psychiatric diagnosis and behavioural assessment. Behaviour Change, 1, 10–16.Google Scholar
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1979). Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: Inquiries into depression and rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1795–1809.Google Scholar
Love, A. W. & Jackson, H. J. (1988). Effects of diagnostic information on a clinician's impressions of an interviewee. Australian Journal of Psychology, 40, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Smith, D. & Kraft, W. A. (1983). DSM-III: Do psychologists really want an alternative? American Psychologist, 38, 777–785.Google Scholar
Srull, T. K. & Wyer, R. S. (1980). Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 841–856.Google Scholar
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 548–573.Google Scholar
Wills, T. A. (1978). Perceptions of clients by professional helpers. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 968–1000.Google Scholar