Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T15:23:16.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Convergent Validity and Test–Retest Reliability of the Oxford Physical Activity Questionnaire for Secondary School Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

David R. Lubans ,
Kathy Sylva  and
Zane Osborn
David R. Lubans*
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, Australia
Kathy Sylva
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, United Kingdom
Zane Osborn
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, Australia
*
*Address for correspondence: David Lubans, University of Newcastle, Faculty of Education and Arts, Callaghan Campus, NSW 2308, Australia. Email: David.Lubans@newcastle.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the convergent validity and test–retest reliability of the Oxford Physical Activity Questionnaire (OPAQ), a self-administered questionnaire designed to assess the activity patterns of adolescents. The test–retest reliability of the OPAQ was assessed by administering the questionnaire on two occasions separated by 1 week (N = 87, mean age = 13.1 ± .9). Intraclass correlation (ICC) was used to examine the test–retest reliability of the OPAQ. The convergent validity of the OPAQ was evaluated using Caltrac accelerometers worn consecutively for 4 days (N = 51, mean age = 12.6 ± .5). Spearman's rank-order correlation was used to examine the convergent validity of the questionnaire. ICCs ranged from .76 to .91 and reliability was higher for males (r = .89) than females (r = .78). Correlations between self-reported physical activity and Caltrac accelerometer counts were related to vigorous physical activity (r = .33, p = .01) and moderate to vigorous activity (r = .32, p = .02). The OPAQ has excellent test–retest reliability and acceptable validity in comparison to other measures of youth physical activity.

Information

Type
Standard Papers
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , 01 April 2008 , pp. 23 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aaron, D.J., Kriska, A.M., Dearwater, S.R., Anderson, R.L., Olsen, T.L., Cauley, J.A., et al. (1993). The epidemiology of leisure physical activity among an adolescent population. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 25, 847–852.Google Scholar
Aaron, D.J., Kriska, A.M., Dearwater, S.R., Cauley, J.A., Metz, K.F., & La Porte, R.E. (1995). Reproducibility and validity of an epidemiologic questionnaire to assess past year physical activity in adolescents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 142, 191–201.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, B.E., Haskell, W.L., Leon, A.S., Jacobs, D.R., Jr., & Montoye, H.J. (1993). Compendium of physical activities: Classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 25, 71–80.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, B.E., Haskell, W.L., Whitt, M.C., Irwin, M.L., Swartz, A.M., Strath, S.J., et al. (2000). Compedium of physical activities: An update of activity codes and MET intensities. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 32, S498–S516.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, B.E., Montoye, H.J., & Leon, A.S. (1994). Methods of assessing physical activity during leisure and work. In C., Bouchard, R.J., Shephard, & T., Stephens (Eds.), Physical activity, fitness and health: International proceedings and consensus statement (pp. 145–159). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Allor, K.M., & Pivarnik, J.M. (2001). Stability and convergent validity of three physical activity assessments. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 33, 671–676.Google Scholar
Armstrong, N., & McManus, A. (1994). Children's fitness and physical activity: A challenge for physical education. British Journal of Physical Education, 25, 20–26.Google Scholar
Baranowski, T., Cullen, K.W., Basen-Engquist, K., Wetter, D.W., Cummings, S., Martineau, D.S., et al. (1988). Validity of self-report of physical activity: An information processing approach. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 59, 314–327.Google Scholar
Booth, M.L., Bauman, A., Owen, N., & Gore, C.J. (1997). Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians. Preventive Medicine, 26, 131–137.Google Scholar
Booth, M.L., Okely, A.D., Chey, T., & Bauman, A. (2002). The reliability and validity of the Adolescent Physical Activity Recall Questionnaire. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 34, 1986–1995.Google Scholar
Caspersen, C.J., Powell, K.E., & Christenson, G.M. (1985). Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: Definitions and distinctions for health related research. Public Health Reports, 100, 126–131.Google Scholar
Crocker, P.R.E., Bailey, D.A., Faulkner, R.A., Kowalski, K.C., & McGrath, R. (1997). Measuring general levels of physical activity: Preliminary evidence for the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 29, 1344–1349.Google Scholar
Department of Health. (2004). At least five a week. London: Author.Google Scholar
Eisenmann, J.C., Strath, S.J., Shadrick, D., Rigsby, P., Hirsch, N., & Jacobson, L. (2004). Validity of uniaxial accelerometry during activities of daily living in children. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 91, 259–263.Google Scholar
Ekelund, U., Poortvliet, E., Nilsson, A., Yngve, A., Holmberg, A., & Sjostrom, M. (2001). Physical activity in relation to aerobic fitness in 14- to 15-year-old boys and girls. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 85, 195–201.Google Scholar
Ekelund, U., Sjostrom, M., Yngve, A., Poortvliet, E., Nilsson, A., Froberg, K., et al. (2001). Physical activity assessed by activity monitor and doubly labeled water in children. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 33, 275–281.Google Scholar
Fowler, J.F.J. (1993). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fowler-Brown, A., & Kahwati, L.C. (2004). Prevention and treatment of overweight in children and adolescents. American Family Physician, 69, 2591–2598.Google Scholar
Gao, S., Harnack, L., Schmitz, K.H., Fulton, J., Lytle, L., Van Coevering, P., et al. (2006). Reliability and validity of a brief tool to measure children's physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 3, 415–422.Google Scholar
Garcia, A.W., George, T.R., Coviak, C., Antonakas, C., & Pender, N.J. (1997). Development of the child/adolescent activity log: A comprehensive and feasible measure of leisure-time physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 323–338.Google Scholar
Godin, G., & Shephard, R.J. (1985). A simple method to assess exercise behaviour in the community. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Science, 10, 141–146.Google Scholar
Harrell, J.S., McMurray, R.G., Baggett, C.D., Pennell, M.L., Pearce, P.F., & Bangdiwala, S.I. (2005). Energy costs of physical activities in children and adolescents. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 37, 8.Google Scholar
Janz, K.F., Witt, J., & Mahoney, L.T. (1995). The stability of children's physical activity as measured by accelerometry and self-report. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 27, 1326–1332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelder, S.H., Perry, C.L., Klepp, K.K., & Lytle, L.L. (1994). Longitudinal tracking of adolescent smoking, physical activity, and food choice behaviors. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 1121–1126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohl, H., Fulton, J., & Caspersen, C. (2000). Assessment of physical activity among children and adolescents: A review and synthesis. Preventive Medicine, 31, S54–S76.Google Scholar
Kriska, A.M., & Casperson, C.J. (1997). Introduction to a collection of physical activity questionnaires. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 29, S5–S9.Google Scholar
Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.Google Scholar
Matthews, C.E. (2002). Use of self-report instruments to assess physical activity. In G.J., Welk (Ed.), Physical activity assessments for health-related research (pp. 107–124). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
McMurray, R.G., Ring, K.B., Treuth, M.S., Welk, G.J., Pate, R.R., Schmitz, K.H., et al. (2004). Comparison of two approaches to structured physical activity surveys for adolescents. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 36, 2125–2143.Google ScholarPubMed
Montoye, H.J., Kemper, H.C.G., Saris, W.H.M., & Washburn, R.A. (1996). Measuring physical activity and energy expenditure. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Google Scholar
Ozdoba, R.S., Corbin, C.B., & LeMasurier, G.C. (2004). Does reactivity exist in children when measuring activity levels with unsealed pedometers? Pediatric Exercise Science, 16, 158–166.Google Scholar
Pate, R.R., Davis, M.G., Robinson, T.N., Stone, E.J., McKenzie, T.L., Young, J.C., et al. (2006). Promoting physical activity in children and youth: A leadership role for schools: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Physical Activity Committee) in collaboration with the Councils on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation, 114, 1214–1224.Google Scholar
Pate, R.R., Ross, R., Dowda, M., Trost, S.G., & Sirard, J. (2003). Validation of a 3-day physical activity recall in female youth. Pediatric Exercise Science, 15, 257–265.Google Scholar
Patterson, P. (2000). Reliability, validity and methodological response to the assessment of physical activity via self-report. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 71, 15–20.Google Scholar
Riddoch, C.J., Bo Anderson, L., Wedderkopp, N., Harro, M., Klasson-Heggebo, L., Sardinha, L.B., et al. (2004). Physical activity levels and patterns of 9- and 15-yr-old European children. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 36, 86–92.Google Scholar
Sallis, J.F. (2000). Age-related decline in physical activity: A synthesis of human and animal studies. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 32, 1598–1600.Google Scholar
Sallis, J.F., Buono, M.J., Roby, J.J., Carlson, D., & Nelson, J.A. (1990). The Caltrac accelerometer as a physical activity monitor for school-aged children. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 22, 698–703.Google Scholar
Sallis, J.F., Buono, M.J., Roby, J.J., Micale, F.G., & Nelson, J.A. (1993). Seven-day recall and other physical activity self-reports in children and adolescents. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 25, 99–108.Google Scholar
Sallis, J.F., & Saelens, B.E. (2000). Assessment of physical activity by self-report: Status, limitations, and future directions. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 71, 1–14.Google Scholar
Shephard, R.J. (2003). Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 37, 197–206.Google Scholar
Sirard, J.R., & Pate, R.R. (2001). Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Sports Medicine, 31, 439–454.Google Scholar
Telford, A., Salmon, J., Jolley, D., & Crawford, D. (2004). Reliability and validity of physical activity questionnaires for children: The Children's Leisure Activities Study Survey (CLASS). Pediatric Exercise Science, 16, 64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trost, S.G. (2001). Objective measurement of physical activity in youth: Current Issues, future directions — An examination of methodological issues related to the use of physical activity monitors in youth. Exercise & Sport Sciences Reviews, 29, 32–36.Google Scholar
Trost, S.G., Pate, R.R., Freedson, P.S., Sallis, J.F., & Taylor, W.C. (2000). Using objective physical activity measures with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed? Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 32, 426–431.Google Scholar
Trost, S., Pate, R., Saunders, R., Ward, D., Dowda, M., & Felton, G. (1997). A prospective study of the determinants of physical activity in rural fifth-grade children. Preventive Medicine, 26, 257–263.Google Scholar
Tudor-Locke, C., Ainsworth, B.E., & Popkin, B.M. (2001). Active commuting to school: An overlooked source of children's physical activity? Sports Medicine, 31, 309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tudor-Locke, C.E., & Myers, A.M. (2001). Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults. Sports Medicine, 31, 91–100.Google Scholar
Vincent, S.D., & Pangrazi, R.P. (2002). Does reactivity exist in children when measuring activity levels with pedometers? Pediatric Exercise Science, 14, 56–63.Google Scholar
Warnecke, R.B., Johnson, T.P., Chavez, N., Sudman, S., O’Rourke, D.P., Lacey, L., et al. (1997). Improving question wording in surveys of culturally diverse populations. Annals of Epidemiology, 7, 334–342.Google Scholar
Weisberg, H.F., Krosnick, J.A., & Bowen, B.D. (1996). An introduction to survey research and data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Welk, G.J., Corbin, C.B., & Dale, D. (2000). Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 71, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weston, A.T., Petosa, R., & Pate, R.R. (1997). Validation of an instrument for measurement of physical activity in youth. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 29, 138–143.Google Scholar
Wong, S.L., Leatherdale, S.T., & Manske, S.R. (2006). Reliability and validity of a school-based physical activity questionnaire. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 38, 1593–1600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed