Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:02:07.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Behavioural Contracting and Preferred Reinforcement on Appointment Keeping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

Robert A. Hayes*
Affiliation:
Kennedy Krieger Institute and The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. rhayes@wisdom.wsc.mass.edu
Lisa A. Efron
Affiliation:
Kennedy Krieger Institute and The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Gina S. Richman
Affiliation:
Kennedy Krieger Institute and The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Kelley A. Harrison
Affiliation:
Kennedy Krieger Institute and The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Elizabeth L. Aguilera
Affiliation:
Kennedy Krieger Institute and The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
*
*Address for correspondence: Robert A. Hayes, PhD, Assistant Professor, Westfield State College, Dept. of Psychology, Westfield, MA 01086-1630, USA.
Get access

Abstract

The current study demonstrates the efficacy of using a behavioural contingency contract in conjunction with family-selected reinforcers to increase appointment keeping among low income families in a child and family therapy clinic. Three families with similar presenting problems participated. A multiple baseline across-subjects design with the addition of a reversal component was utilised. Upon treatment implementation, contracts were signed by family members stating that they would receive coupons valuing $30.00 after attending four consecutive clinic appointments. These coupons were selected by the family from a diverse menu. Results indicated increases in appointment keeping following implementation of the behavioural contract. The cost effectiveness of using a behavioural contract in conjunction with economic incentives with low-income families is discussed, and suggestions for future research on appointment keeping are made.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)