Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:59:46.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of the Triple P Seminar Series on Canadian Parents’ Use of Physical Punishment, Non-Physical Punishment and Non-Punitive Responses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2019

Miriam Gonzalez ,
Christine A. Ateah ,
Joan E. Durrant  and
Steven Feldgaier
Miriam Gonzalez*
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
Christine A. Ateah
Affiliation:
College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Joan E. Durrant
Affiliation:
Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Steven Feldgaier
Affiliation:
Clinical Health Psychology, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
*
*Corresponding author: Miriam Gonzalez, McGill University and at the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, H4A 3S5. Email: miriam.gonzalez@mail.mcgill.ca
Get access

Abstract

Physical punishment of children is linked to negative developmental outcomes. The widely used Positive Parenting Program (Triple P) promotes alternative responses to physical punishment. Data on the effectiveness of the Triple P Seminar Series is limited. In this study, Canadian parents’ reports of physical punishment, non-physical punishment, and non-punitive responses were compared before and after they attended the Triple P Seminar Series. Twenty-seven parents of children aged 2 to 6 years attended the Seminar Series and completed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires measuring the number of times they used various physical punishments, non-physical punishments, and non-punitive responses in the past month. Hypotheses were tested using univariate descriptive analyses, paired samples t tests, and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests. Parents’ reports of physical punishment decreased on only one of the four physical punishment items (shaking/grabbing) from pre- to post-intervention. Over the course of the Seminar Series, parents became more likely to emphasise rules and to punish their children by taking things away from them. The findings suggest that the Seminar Series has limited effectiveness in reducing physical punishments or increasing non-punitive responses. Further research on this question is needed.

Keywords

parenting trainingphysical punishmentparenting responsesCanadian parent
Type
Standard Paper
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 102 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amato, PR and Fowler, F (2002). Parenting practices, child adjustment, and family diversity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 703–716.Google Scholar
Anda, RF, Felitti, VJ, Bremmer, JD, Walker, JD, Whitfield, C, Perry, BD, Dube, SR and Giles, WH (2006). The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood: A convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 256, 174–186.Google Scholar
Arnold, DS, O'Leary, SG, Wolff, LS and Acker, MM (1993). The Parenting Scale: A measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. Psychological Assessment, 5, 137–144.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G, Cina, A, Ledermann, T and Sanders, MR (2008). The efficacy of Positive Parenting Program (Triple P) in improving parenting and child behaviour: A comparison with two other treatment conditions. Behavior Research and Therapy, 46, 411–427.Google Scholar
Carlo, G, Knight, GP, McGinley, M and Hayes, R (2011). The roles of parental inductions, moral emotions, and moral cognitions in prosocial tendencies among Mexican American and European American early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 757–781.Google Scholar
De Graaf, I, Speetjens, P, Smit, F, de Wolff, M and Tavecchio, L (2008a). Effectiveness of the Triple P Positive Parenting program on parenting: A meta-analysis. Family Relations, 57, 553–566.Google Scholar
De Graaf, I, Speetjens, P, Smit, F, de Wolff, M and Tavecchio, L (2008b). Effectiveness of the Triple P positive parenting program on behavioral problems in children: A meta-analysis. Behavior Modification, 32, 714–735.Google Scholar
Durrant, JE (2008). Physical punishment, culture, and rights: Current issues for professionals. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 29, 55–66.Google Scholar
Durrant, JE and Ensom, R (2012). Physical punishment of children: Lessons from 20 years of research. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 184, 1373–1377.Google Scholar
Durrant, JE, Ensom, R and Coalition on Physical Punishment of Children and Youth (2004). Joint Statement on Physical Punishment of Children and Youth. Ottawa, Canada: Coalition on Physical Punishment of Children and Youth.Google Scholar
Fabiano, GA, Pelham, WE, Manos, MJ, Gnagy, EM, Chronis, AM, Onyango, AN … Swain, S (2004). An evaluation of three time-out procedures for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Therapy, 35, 449–469.Google Scholar
Faul, F, Erdfelder, E, Buchner, A and Lang, A-G (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.Google Scholar
Fréchette, S and Romano, E (2015). Change in corporal punishment over time in a representative sample of Canadian parents. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 507–517.Google Scholar
Ford, AD, Olmi, DJ, Edwards, RP and Tingstrom, DH (2001). The sequential introduction of compliance training components with elementary-aged children in general education. School Psychology Quaterly, 16, 142–157.Google Scholar
Gershoff, ET (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 539–579.Google Scholar
Gershoff, ET (2010). More harm than good: A summary of scientific research on the intended and unintended effects of corporal punishment on children. Law and Contemporary Problems, 73, 31–56.Google Scholar
Gershoff, ET and Grogan-Kaylor, A (2016). Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 30, 453–469. doi:10.1037/fam0000191Google Scholar
Hahlweg, K, Heinrichs, N, Kuschel, A and Feldmann, M (2008). Therapist-assisted, self-administered bibliotherapy to enhance parental competence: Short and long term effects. Behavior Modification, 32, 659–681.Google Scholar
Healthy Child Manitoba (2015). Healthy Child Manitoba annual report 2014–2015. Retrieved February 12, 2016 from http://www.gov.mb.ca/healthychild/about/annual.htmlGoogle Scholar
Heinrichs, N, Bertram, H, Kuschel, A and Hahlweg, K (2005). Parent recruitment and retention in a universal prevention program for child behavior and emotional problems: Barriers to research and program participation. Prevention Science, 6, 275–286.Google Scholar
Hester, PP, Hendrickson, JM and Gable, RA (2009). Forty years later: The value of praise, ignoring, and rules for preschoolers at risk for behavior disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 513–535.Google Scholar
Hoeve, M, Dubas, JS, Eichelsheim, VI, van der Laan, PH, Smeenk, W and Gerris, JRM (2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 749–775.Google Scholar
Holden, GW (2001). Parental responses to chid misbehavior (PRCM). In Touliatos, J, Perlmutter, BF and Holden, GW (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques (vol 2, Abstracts). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Holden, GW, Coleman, S, and Schmidt, K (1995). Why 3-year-old children get spanked- parent and child determinants as reported by college educated mothers. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 41, 431–452.Google Scholar
Jeynes, WH (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42, 82–110.Google Scholar
Jones, DJ, Forehand, R, Brody, GH and Armistead, L (2002). Positive parenting and child psychosocial adjustment in inner-city single-parent African American families. Behavior Modification, 26, 464–481.Google Scholar
Laroche, KJ, Lee, CM and Ateah, CA (2013, June 13). Changing tides: Physical punishment use by Canadian parents. Symposium presentation at Canadian Psychological Association convention. Québec City: QC.Google Scholar
Leung, C, Sanders, MR, Ip, F and Lau, J (2006). Implementation of Triple P positive parenting program in Hong Kong: Predictors of program completion and clinical outcomes. Journal of Children's Services, 1, 4–17.Google Scholar
Leung, C, Sanders, MR, Leung, S, Mak, R and Lau, J (2003). An outcome evaluation of the implementation of the Triple P--Positive Parenting Program in Hong Kong. Family Process, 42, 531–544.Google Scholar
Martin, G and Pear, J (2010). Behavior modification: What it is and how to do it (10th ed). Pearson Education: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y, Sofronoff, K and Sanders, MR (2007). The efficacy of the Triple P Positive Parenting program with Japanese parents. Behavior Change, 24, 205–218.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y, Sofronoff, K and Sanders, MR (2010). Investigation of the effectiveness and social validity of the Triple P – Positive Parenting Program in Japanese society. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 87–91.Google Scholar
McConnell, D, Breitkreuz, R, Savage, A and Hamilton, A (2010). Supported parenting: Integrating ‘Triple P’ into parent link centres — An independent evaluation. Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta, Family and Disabilities Studies.Google Scholar
McLeod, BD, Weisz, JR and Wood, JJ (2007). Examining the association between parenting and childhood depression: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 986–1003.Google Scholar
McLeroy, KR, Bibeau, D, Steckler, A and Glanz, K (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 351–377.Google Scholar
Morawska, A, Sanders, MR, Haslam, D, Filus, A and Fletcher, R (2014). Child adjustment and parent efficacy scale: Development and initial validation of a parent report measure. Australian Psychologist, 49, 241–252.Google Scholar
Nowak, C and Heinrichs, N (2008). A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P positive parenting program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11, 114–144.Google Scholar
Prinz, RJ, Sanders, MR, Shapiro, CJ, Whitaker, DJ and Lutzker, JR (2009). Population based prevention of child maltreatment: The US Triple P system population trial. Prevention Science, 10, 1–12.Google Scholar
Sanders, MR (2008). Triple P Positive Parenting Program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 506–517.Google Scholar
Sanders, MR, Healy, KL, Grice, C and Del Vecchio, T (2017). Evidence-based parenting programs: Integrating science into school-based practice. In Thielking, M & MD Terjesen (Eds.), Handbook of Australian school psychology: Integrating international research, practice, and policy (pp. 537–552). Switzerland: Springer InternationalGoogle Scholar
Sanders, MR, Kirby, JN, Tellegen, L and Day, JJ (2014). The Triple P Positive Parenting Program: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting Support. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 337–357.Google Scholar
Sanders, MR, Markie-Dadds, C, and Turner, KMT (2003). Theoretical, scientific and clinical foundations of the Triple P Positive Parenting program: A population approach to the promotion of parenting competence. Parenting Research and Practice Monograph, 1, 1–24.Google Scholar
Sanders, MR, Markie-Dadds, C, and Turner, KMT (2005). Every parent's survival guide. Brisbane, Australia: Triple P International Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
Sanders, MR, Morawska, A, Haslam, DM, Filus, A and Fletcher, R (2014). Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS): Validation of a brief parent-report measure for use in assessment of parenting skills and family relationships. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 45, 255–272.Google Scholar
Sanders, MR, Prior, J and Ralph, A (2009). An evaluation of a brief universal seminar series on positive parenting: A feasibility study. Journal of Children's Services, 4, 4–20.Google Scholar
Sanders, MR, Ralph, A, Sofronoff, K, Gardiner, P, Thompson, R, Dwyer, S and Bidwell, K (2008). Every family: A population approach to reducing behavioral and emotionalproblems in children making the transition to school. Journal of Primary Prevention, 29, 197–222.Google Scholar
Sanders, MR and Turner, KMT (2005). Facilitator's manual for Selected Triple P. Brisbane, Australia: Triple P International.Google Scholar
Straus, MA and Fauchier, A (2007). Manual for the Dimensions of Discipline Inventory (DDI). Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Family Research Laboratory. Retrieved from http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/Google Scholar
Sumargi, A, Sofronoff, K and Morawska, A (2014). Evaluation of a brief format of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program: A pilot study with Indonesian parents residing in Australia. Behavior Change, 31, 144–158.Google Scholar
Sumargi, A, Sofronoff, K and Morawska, A (2015). A randomized-controlled trial of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program seminar series with Indonesian parents. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 46, 747–762.Google Scholar
Thomas, R and Zimmer-Gembach, MJ (2007). Behavioral outcomes of parent-child interaction therapy and Triple P positive parenting program: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 475–495.Google Scholar
Triple P Positive Parenting Program (n.d.). The world of Triple P. Retrieved October 7, 2017 from http://www.triplep.net/glo-en/find-out-about-triple-p/the-world-of-triple-p/Google Scholar
Trocmé, N and Durrant, JE (2003). Physical punishment and the response of the Canadian child welfare system: Implications for legislative reform. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 25, 39–56.Google Scholar
Trocmé, N, Fallon, B, MacLaurin, B, Daciuk, J, Felstiner, C, Black, T… Cloutier, R (2005). Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect – 2003: Major findings. Minister of Public Works and Government Services CanadaGoogle Scholar
Trocmé, N, MacLaurin, B, Fallon, B, Daciuk, J, Billingsley, D, Tourigny, M … McKenzie, B (2001). Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect: Final report. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.Google Scholar
Turner, K, Richards, M and Sanders, MR (2007). Randomised clinical trial of a group parent education programme for Australian indigenous families. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 43, 429–437.Google Scholar
UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime) (2009). Compilation of evidence-based family skills training programmes. Retrieved Dec 02, 2012 from http://www.unodc.org/docs/youthnet/Compilation/10-50018_Ebook.pdfGoogle Scholar
Voisine, S and Baker, AJL (2012). Do universal parenting programs discourage parents from using corporal punishment: A program review. The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 93, 212–218.Google Scholar