Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:50:18.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Therapist Competence in Cognitive-behavioural Therapies: Review of the Contemporary Empirical Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

Nikolaos Kazantzis*
Affiliation:
Massey University, New Zealand
*
Address for correspondence: Nikolaos Kazantzis Ph.D., School of Psychology at Albany, and Waitemata District Health, Board Cognitive Therapy Centre, Massey University, Private Bag 102904, NSMC, Auckland, New Zealand. Email: N.Kazantzis@massey.ac.nz
Get access

Abstract

Therapist competence refers to the extent that a given treatment is conducted in accordance with the instructions or intentions of the respective treatment manual. Despite this relatively straightforward notion, existing research on cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) processes have been unsuccessful in defining and measuring this construct. This article reviews the contemporary empirical research on therapist competence in CBT, outlines the development and psychometric evaluation of the commonly used measures of therapist adherence, and discusses how competence has been linked to treatment outcomes. The psychometric evidence for existing measures is mixed, and in particular, there has been difficulty in the demonstration of adequate interrater reliability, even among identified experts in the field. New measures of therapist competence hold promise — most notably, in the separation of therapist adherence and competence constructs. The assessment of therapist adherence, therapist competence, and the role of supervisor ratings in the clinical context are also discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)