Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T12:21:09.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Utilising Family Resources to Manage Tantrum Behaviour: A Home-based Single-subject Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Alan Ralph*
Affiliation:
Murdoch University
*
School of Social Inquiry—Psychology Section, Murdoch University, Murdoch W.A. 6150
Get access

Abstract

The mother of a 7-year old boy with Down's syndrome was taught to use and to instruct others how to implement a behavioural management program to eliminate tantrum behaviour at home and in other social settings which was both frequent and persistent. The mother was the only person contacted throughout the program, which comprised three brief visits to the home and three telephone conversations. The program consisted of the extinction of tantrum behaviour using time-out from reinforcement coupled with differential reinforcement of appropriate behaviour. The behavioural objective of three consecutive days without tantrums was reached 18 days after the program was implemented and was maintained for a further 7 days, with only one minor relapse which occurred in a new setting. Six months later the improvement was being maintained. A brief discussion of factors affecting generalization and maintenance is included.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aeschleman, S. R., & Schladenhauffen, J. (1984). Acquisition, generalisation and maintenance of grocery shopping skills by severely mentally retarded adolescents. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 5, 245258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baer, D. M. (1982). The role of current pragmatics in the future analysis of generalization technology. In Stuart, R. B. (ed.), Adherence, compliance and generalization in behavioral medicine (pp. 192212). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Baer, R. A., Osnes, P. G., & Stokes, T. F. (1983). Training generalized correspondence between verbal behavior at school and nonverbal behavior at home. Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 379388.Google Scholar
Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1984). The scientist-practitioner: Research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, M., & Hudson, A. (1980). Parent training. In Hudson, A. & Griffin, M. (eds), Behaviour analysis and the problems of childhood (pp. 201220). Melbourne: PIT Publishing.Google Scholar
Horner, R. H., & McDonald, R. S. (1982). Comparison of single instance and general case instruction in teaching a generalized vocational skill. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7, 720.Google Scholar
Leach, D. J. (in press). Increasing the use and maintenance of behaviour-based practices in schools: An example of a general problem for applied psychologists?Australian Psychologist.Google Scholar
Lindsey, W. R., & Stoffelmeyr, B. E. (1982). The concept of generalization in behaviour therapy. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 10, 346355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, Oregon: Castalia Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Ralph, A., & Birnbrauer, J. S. (1985). A task analytic approach to generalization: An alternative to behavioural alchemy. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of the Australian Behaviour Modification Association (pp. 417426). Melbourne: A.B.M.A.Google Scholar
Sanders, M. R., & James, J. (1983). The modification of parent behaviour: A review of generalization and maintenance. Behavior Modification, 7, 327.Google Scholar